Literature DB >> 12637580

Reb1p-dependent DNA bending effects nucleosome positioning and constitutive transcription at the yeast profilin promoter.

Michaela Angermayr1, Ulrich Oechsner, Wolfhard Bandlow.   

Abstract

The molecular basis of constitutive gene activation is largely unknown. The yeast profilin gene (PFY1), encoding a housekeeping component of the actin cytoskeleton, is constitutively transcribed at a moderate level. The PFY1 promoter dispenses with classical transactivators and a consensus TATA box; however, it contains a canonic site for the abundant multifunctional nuclear factor rDNA enhancer-binding protein (Reb1p) combined with a dA.dT element. Reb1p binds specifically in vitro. Mutation of this site reduces PFY1 expression to about 35%. A nucleosome-free gap of about 190 bp is centered at the genomic Reb1p binding site in vivo and spans the presumptive core promoter and transcriptional initiation sites. Nucleosomes at the border of the gap are positioned. Mutation of the Reb1p motif in the genomic PFY1 promoter abolishes nucleosome positioning, fills the gap with a non-positioned nucleosome, and reduces transcription by a factor of 3. From permutation studies we conclude that Reb1p induces a strong bend into the DNA. Phasing analyses indicate that it is directed toward the major groove. The data suggest that Reb1p plays an architectural role on DNA and that Reb1p-dependent DNA bending leads to a DNA conformation that is incompatible with packaging into nucleosomes and concomitantly facilitates constitutive transcription. In the absence of other transcription activators, Reb1p excludes nucleosomes and moderately stimulates transcription by distorting DNA.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12637580     DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M301806200

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biol Chem        ISSN: 0021-9258            Impact factor:   5.157


  22 in total

1.  A determining influence for CpG dinucleotides on nucleosome positioning in vitro.

Authors:  Colin S Davey; Sari Pennings; Carmel Reilly; Richard R Meehan; James Allan
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2004-08-13       Impact factor: 16.971

2.  Formation of boundaries of transcriptionally silent chromatin by nucleosome-excluding structures.

Authors:  Xin Bi; Qun Yu; Joseph J Sandmeier; Yanfei Zou
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 4.272

3.  The evolution of epitype.

Authors:  Richard B Meagher
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  2010-06-15       Impact factor: 11.277

4.  Genome-wide nucleosome specificity and directionality of chromatin remodelers.

Authors:  Kuangyu Yen; Vinesh Vinayachandran; Kiran Batta; R Thomas Koerber; B Franklin Pugh
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2012-06-22       Impact factor: 41.582

5.  Histone variant H2A.Z marks the 5' ends of both active and inactive genes in euchromatin.

Authors:  Ryan M Raisner; Paul D Hartley; Marc D Meneghini; Marie Z Bao; Chih Long Liu; Stuart L Schreiber; Oliver J Rando; Hiten D Madhani
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2005-10-21       Impact factor: 41.582

6.  Genome-wide expression profiling, in vivo DNA binding analysis, and probabilistic motif prediction reveal novel Abf1 target genes during fermentation, respiration, and sporulation in yeast.

Authors:  Ulrich Schlecht; Ionas Erb; Philippe Demougin; Nicolas Robine; Valérie Borde; Erik van Nimwegen; Alain Nicolas; Michael Primig
Journal:  Mol Biol Cell       Date:  2008-02-27       Impact factor: 4.138

7.  Distinguishing direct versus indirect transcription factor-DNA interactions.

Authors:  Raluca Gordân; Alexander J Hartemink; Martha L Bulyk
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2009-08-03       Impact factor: 9.043

8.  Chromosomal position effects are linked to sir2-mediated variation in transcriptional burst size.

Authors:  Cory Batenchuk; Simon St-Pierre; Lioudmila Tepliakova; Samyuktha Adiga; Anna Szuto; Nazir Kabbani; John C Bell; Kristin Baetz; Mads Kærn
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2011-05-18       Impact factor: 4.033

9.  Alpha1-induced DNA bending is required for transcriptional activation by the Mcm1-alpha1 complex.

Authors:  Edward A Carr; Janet Mead; Andrew K Vershon
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2004-04-26       Impact factor: 16.971

10.  Many sequence-specific chromatin modifying protein-binding motifs show strong positional preferences for potential regulatory regions in the Saccharomyces cerevisiae genome.

Authors:  Loren Hansen; Leonardo Mariño-Ramírez; David Landsman
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2010-01-04       Impact factor: 16.971

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.