Literature DB >> 12637483

General quality of life 2 years following treatment for prostate cancer: what influences outcomes? Results from the prostate cancer outcomes study.

David F Penson1, Ziding Feng, Alan Kuniyuki, Dale McClerran, Peter C Albertsen, Dennis Deapen, Frank Gilliland, Richard Hoffman, Robert A Stephenson, Arnold L Potosky, Janet L Stanford.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The goal of this study was to determine the relationship between primary treatment, urinary dysfunction, sexual dysfunction, and general health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in prostate cancer.
METHODS: A sample of men with newly diagnosed prostate cancer between 1994 and 1995 was randomly selected from six population-based Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results registries. A baseline survey was completed by 2,306 men within 6 to 12 months of diagnosis, and these men also completed a follow-up HRQOL survey 2 years after diagnosis. Logistic regression models were used to determine whether primary treatment, urinary dysfunction, and sexual dysfunction were independently associated with general HRQOL outcomes approximately 2 years after diagnosis as measured by the Medical Outcomes Study 36-item Short Form Health Survey. The magnitude of this effect was estimated using least square means models.
RESULTS: After adjustment for potential confounders, primary treatment was not associated with 2-year general HRQOL outcomes in men with prostate cancer. Urinary function and bother were independently associated with worse general HRQOL in all domains. Sexual function and bother were also independently associated with worse general HRQOL, although the relationship was not as strong as in the urinary domains.
CONCLUSION: Primary treatment is not associated with 2-year general HRQOL outcomes in prostate cancer. Although both sexual and urinary function and bother are associated with quality of life, men who are more bothered by their urination or impotence are more likely to report worse quality of life. This implies that future research should be directed toward finding ways to improve treatment-related outcomes or help patients better cope with their posttreatment urinary or sexual dysfunction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12637483     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2003.07.139

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  30 in total

Review 1.  [Quality of life after radical urologic pelvic surgery and impact of inpatient rehabilitation].

Authors:  O Dombo; U Otto
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 0.639

2.  Cognitive behavioral stress management intervention improves quality of life in Spanish monolingual hispanic men treated for localized prostate cancer: results of a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Frank J Penedo; Lara Traeger; Jason Dahn; Ivan Molton; Jeffrey S Gonzalez; Neil Schneiderman; Michael H Antoni
Journal:  Int J Behav Med       Date:  2007

Review 3.  Psychosocial perspectives on sexual recovery after prostate cancer treatment.

Authors:  Lauren M Walker; Richard J Wassersug; John W Robinson
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2015-03-10       Impact factor: 14.432

4.  Dyadic concordance among prostate cancer patients and their partners and health-related quality of life: does it matter?

Authors:  Erin L Merz; Vanessa L Malcarne; Celine M Ko; Melody Sadler; Lisa Kwack; James W Varni; Georgia Robins Sadler
Journal:  Psychol Health       Date:  2011-07-11

5.  Health related quality of life for men treated for localized prostate cancer with long-term followup.

Authors:  George J Huang; Natalia Sadetsky; David F Penson
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 7.450

6.  Nightly sildenafil use after radical prostatectomy has adverse effects on urinary convalescence: Results from a randomized trial of nightly vs on-demand dosing regimens.

Authors:  Matthew Eric Hyndman; Trinity J Bivalacqua; Lynda Z Mettee; Li-Ming Su; Bruce J Trock; Christian P Pavlovich
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2015-11-09       Impact factor: 1.862

7.  Treatment regret and quality of life following radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Chelsea G Ratcliff; Lorenzo Cohen; Curtis A Pettaway; Patricia A Parker
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2013-08-02       Impact factor: 3.603

8.  The effect of nerve-sparing surgery on patient-reported continence post-radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Paul Toren; Shabbir M H Alibhai; Andre Matthew; Michael Nesbitt; Robin Kalnin; Neil Fleshner; John Trachtenberg
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 1.862

Review 9.  The spectrum of prostate cancer care: from curative intent to palliation.

Authors:  Ased S M Ali; Freddie C Hamdy
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 3.092

10.  Quality of life three years after diagnosis of localised prostate cancer: population based cohort study.

Authors:  David P Smith; Madeleine T King; Sam Egger; Martin P Berry; Phillip D Stricker; Paul Cozzi; Jeanette Ward; Dianne L O'Connell; Bruce K Armstrong
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2009-11-27
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.