Literature DB >> 12637111

Effect of amlodipine on systolic blood pressure.

Cindy B Levine1, Kyle R Fahrbach, Diana Frame, Janet E Connelly, Rhonda P Estok, Linda R Stone, Veronica Ludensky.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Systolic hypertension is the most common form of hypertension, particularly in people aged >60 years. Caused by decreased compliance of large arteries, systolic hypertension is an independent risk factor for cardiovascular disease. Recent studies have demonstrated that it is more important to control systolic blood pressure (SBP) than diastolic blood pressure (DBP).
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to perform a systematic literature review to examine the effectiveness of amlodipine in lowering SBP in a variety of patient subgroups and clinical settings.
METHODS: The literature review methodology included identifying, selecting, appraising, extracting, and synthesizing primary research studies. Following an a priori protocol, published literature was searched from 1980 to 2001 using 3 electronic databases. A manual review of the reference lists of recent review articles and all accepted studies was performed. Parallel-group, randomized, controlled trials that included at least 10 adults with baseline hypertension (SBP>or=140 mm Hg, DBP>or=90 mm Hg, or both), included at least 1 arm randomized to initial treatment with amlodipine monotherapy, had a minimum treatment duration of 8 weeks, and reported baseline and end-point blood pressure were included.
RESULTS: Of 696 citations identified, 85 primary studies met all inclusion criteria. Comparable treatment arms were pooled, and weightd mean SBP was calculated. In the amlodipine monotherapy arms, which included >5000 patients, SBP decreased by a mean of 17.5 mm Hg from baseline. The effect of amlodipine in reducing SBP was greater in elderly patients (age>or=60 years) and patients with author-defined isolated systolic hypertension. The dose was titrated to achieve the target blood pressure in 73 of 89 amlodipine treatment arms, whereas 16 treatment arms reported fixed doses. The median daily dose was 5 mg (range, 1.25-15 mg) in both the fixed-dose and dose-titration groups.
CONCLUSIONS: In this review of the published literature, amlodipine monotherapy was effective in reducing SBP. Antihypertensive agents such as amlodipine warrant consideration for the management of patients with inadequately controlled SBP.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12637111     DOI: 10.1016/s0149-2918(03)90007-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Ther        ISSN: 0149-2918            Impact factor:   3.393


  8 in total

1.  Tolerability and effectiveness of (S)-amlodipine compared with racemic amlodipine in hypertension: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Fang Liu; Meng Qiu; Suo-Di Zhai
Journal:  Curr Ther Res Clin Exp       Date:  2010-02

2.  Brain renin-angiotensin system blockade by systemically active aminopeptidase A inhibitors: a potential treatment of salt-dependent hypertension.

Authors:  Marie-Claude Fournie-Zaluski; Celine Fassot; Bruno Valentin; Dragan Djordjijevic; Annabelle Reaux-Le Goazigo; Pierre Corvol; Bernard P Roques; Catherine Llorens-Cortes
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-05-10       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 3.  Aminopeptidase A inhibitors as centrally acting antihypertensive agents.

Authors:  Laurence Bodineau; Alain Frugière; Yannick Marc; Cédric Claperon; Catherine Llorens-Cortes
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2008-01-03       Impact factor: 4.214

4.  Guiding dose adjustment of amlodipine after co-administration with ritonavir containing regimens using a physiologically-based pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic model.

Authors:  Dwaipayan Mukherjee; Jiuhong Zha; Rajeev M Menon; Mohamad Shebley
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn       Date:  2018-02-09       Impact factor: 2.745

5.  Ambulatory blood pressure response to S-amlodipine in Korean adult patients with uncontrolled essential hypertension: A prospective, observational study.

Authors:  Dong Kyun Kim; Joon Ho Ahn; Ki Hong Lee; Si-Hyuck Kang; Sung Soo Kim; Jin Oh Na; Sang Don Park; Kye Taek Ahn; Jung-Hee Lee; In Hyun Jung; Jongkwon Seo; Woong Gil Choi
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2022-02-21       Impact factor: 3.738

6.  Application of physiologically-based pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic models to evaluate the interaction between nifedipine and apatinib.

Authors:  Hongrui Liu; Yiqun Yu; Lu Liu; Chunyan Wang; Nan Guo; Xiaojuan Wang; Xiaoqiang Xiang; Bing Han
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2022-08-26       Impact factor: 5.988

Review 7.  Hypertension and the elderly: more than just blood pressure control.

Authors:  Lawrence Baruch
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 3.738

8.  Knowledge, Awareness and Self-Care Practices of Hypertension Among Cardiac Hypertensive Patients.

Authors:  Muhammad Bilal; Abdul Haseeb; Sehan Siraj Lashkerwala; Ibrahim Zahid; Khadijah Siddiq; Muhammad Saad; Mudassir Iqbal Dar; Mohammad Hussham Arshad; Waqas Shahnawaz; Bilal Ahmed; Aimen Yaqub
Journal:  Glob J Health Sci       Date:  2015-06-01
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.