Literature DB >> 12636963

Factors associated with success of emergent second-trimester cerclage.

Mary Faith C Terkildsen1, Barbara V Parilla, Praveen Kumar, William A Grobman.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the factors associated with delivery greater than or equal to 28 weeks' gestation after placement of an emergent cerclage in women with singleton gestations.
METHODS: All women who underwent emergent cerclage, defined as any cerclage placed between 16 and 24 6/7 weeks' gestation in response to documented cervical change on physical examination, at Northwestern Memorial Hospital from 1980 to 2000 were identified. Univariable and multivariable analyses were used to determine the factors most associated with achieving at least 28 weeks' gestation.
RESULTS: One hundred sixteen women were eligible for analysis. Maternal age, race, and operative variables such as suture type and use of antibiotics were not associated with differences in the frequency of delivery at or after 28 weeks. Cerclage placement at or after 22 weeks' gestation increased the likelihood of reaching 28 weeks, whereas several cervical examination findings (dilatation greater than 3 cm, cervical length less than 0.5 cm, and membranes prolapsing beyond the external cervical os) as well as need for placement in a nullipara significantly reduced the likelihood of reaching 28 weeks. In multivariable analysis, nulliparity (odds ratio 0.31, 95% confidence interval 0.1, 0.8) and membranes prolapsing beyond the external cervical os (odds ratio 0.24, 95% confidence interval 0.1, 0.4) continued to be associated with delivery before 28 weeks, whereas cerclage placement at or after 22 weeks (odds ratio 3.2, 95% confidence interval 1.2, 8.6) increased the chance of achieving at least 28 weeks' gestation.
CONCLUSION: Nulliparity, the presence of membranes prolapsing beyond the external cervical os, and gestational age less than 22 weeks at cerclage placement are associated with decreased chance of delivery at or after 28 weeks after emergent cerclage; these factors may be used to help counsel patients considering the procedure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12636963     DOI: 10.1016/s0029-7844(02)03117-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0029-7844            Impact factor:   7.661


  7 in total

1.  Rescue cerclage in IVF pregnancies with second trimester cervical dilatation: Case report and literature review.

Authors:  Banu Kumbak; Rukset Attar; Gazi Yıldırım; Narter Yeşildağlar; Cem Fıçıcıoğlu
Journal:  J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc       Date:  2009-12-01

2.  Anterior uterocervical angle measurement improves prediction of cerclage failure.

Authors:  J C Knight; E Tenbrink; J Sheng; A S Patil
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2017-01-05       Impact factor: 2.521

3.  Patients with acute cervical insufficiency without intra-amniotic infection/inflammation treated with cerclage have a good prognosis.

Authors:  Max Mönckeberg; Rafael Valdés; Juan P Kusanovic; Manuel Schepeler; Jyh K Nien; Emiliano Pertossi; Pablo Silva; Karla Silva; Pía Venegas; Ulises Guajardo; Roberto Romero; Sebastián E Illanes
Journal:  J Perinat Med       Date:  2019-07-26       Impact factor: 2.716

4.  Perioperative Use of Cefazolin and Indomethacin for Physical Examination-Indicated Cerclages to Improve Gestational Latency.

Authors:  Ashish Premkumar; Nikita Sinha; Emily S Miller; Alan M Peaceman
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2020-06       Impact factor: 7.623

Review 5.  Antibiotic prophylaxis in obstetric procedures.

Authors:  Julie van Schalkwyk; Nancy Van Eyk
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol Can       Date:  2010-09

6.  Prediction of emergency cerclage outcomes in women with cervical insufficiency: The role of inflammatory, angiogenic, and extracellular matrix-related proteins in amniotic fluid.

Authors:  Kyong-No Lee; Kyo Hoon Park; Yu Mi Kim; Iseop Cho; Tae Eun Kim
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-05-10       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  A nomogram to predict extremely preterm birth in women with singleton pregnancies undergoing cervical cerclage.

Authors:  Min Lv; Cheng Chen; Liping Qiu; Neng Jin; Minmin Wang; Baihui Zhao; Danqing Chen; Qiong Luo
Journal:  Heliyon       Date:  2022-09-22
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.