Literature DB >> 12635502

Imaging of osteomyelitis and musculoskeletal soft tissue infections: current concepts.

C Santiago Restrepo1, Carlos R Giménez, Kevin McCarthy.   

Abstract

The diagnostic imaging of osteomyelitis can require the confluence of multiple imaging technologies. Conventional radiography should always be the first imaging modality. Sonography is most useful in the diagnosis of fluid collections in a joint or in the extra-articular soft tissues but is not useful for evaluating presence of osseous infection. CT scan can be a useful method to detect early osseous erosion and to document the presence of sequestrum, foreign body, or gas formation but generally is less sensitive than other modalities for the detection of bone infection. Nuclear medicine and MRI are the most sensitive and most specific imaging modalities for the detection of osteomyelitis. Nuclear medicine is particularly useful in identifying multifocal involvement, which is common in children. MRI provides more accurate information of the local extent of the soft tissues and possible soft tissue abscess in patients with musculoskeletal infection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12635502     DOI: 10.1016/s0889-857x(02)00078-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rheum Dis Clin North Am        ISSN: 0889-857X            Impact factor:   2.670


  22 in total

1.  Radiographic imaging in osteomyelitis: the role of plain radiography, computed tomography, ultrasonography, magnetic resonance imaging, and scintigraphy.

Authors:  Carlos Pineda; Rolando Espinosa; Angelica Pena
Journal:  Semin Plast Surg       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 2.314

2.  Gray-scale and color Doppler ultrasonographic evaluation of reactivated post-traumatic/postoperative chronic osteomyelitis.

Authors:  A P Balanika; O Papakonstantinou; C J Kontopoulou; C S Baltas; S Athanassia; K Kanelakopoulou; E Brountzos; A Gouliamos; N L Kelekis
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2008-12-10       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 3.  [Indications for magnetic resonance imaging in Internal Medicine. When do we really need this technology?].

Authors:  A G Schreyer; K Debl; H Herfarth
Journal:  Internist (Berl)       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 0.743

Review 4.  Update on imaging of non-infectious musculoskeletal complications of HIV infection.

Authors:  T C Booth; N C Chhaya; J R G Bell; B J Holloway
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2012-05-23       Impact factor: 2.199

5.  Musculoskeletal infection imaging: past, present, and future.

Authors:  Santiago Restrepo; Daniel Vargas; Roy Riascos; Hugo Cuellar
Journal:  Curr Infect Dis Rep       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 3.725

6.  Magnetic resonance imaging of pressure sores in spinal cord injured patients: accuracy in predicting osteomyelitis.

Authors:  Luis López de Heredia; Jennifer Hauptfleisch; Richard Hughes; Allison Graham; Tom M M Meagher
Journal:  Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil       Date:  2012

Review 7.  The imaging of osteomyelitis.

Authors:  Yu Jin Lee; Sufi Sadigh; Kshitij Mankad; Nikhil Kapse; Gajan Rajeswaran
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2016-04

8.  Unusual manifestations of vertebral osteomyelitis: intraosseous lesions mimicking metastases.

Authors:  C Y Hsu; C W Yu; M Z Wu; B B Chen; K M Huang; T T F Shih
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2008-03-20       Impact factor: 3.825

9.  Ewing sarcoma versus osteomyelitis: differential diagnosis with magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  B Henninger; B Glodny; A Rudisch; T Trieb; A Loizides; D Putzer; W Judmaier; M F Schocke
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2013-05-19       Impact factor: 2.199

10.  Osteomyelitis: approach to diagnosis and treatment.

Authors:  Joseph M Fritz; Jay R McDonald
Journal:  Phys Sportsmed       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 2.241

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.