Literature DB >> 12635130

The clinical evaluation of HER-2 status: which test to use?

John Bartlett1, Elizabeth Mallon, Tim Cooke.   

Abstract

Accurate determination of the status of the type I receptor tyrosine kinase HER-2 in breast carcinomas provides significant insight into patient prognosis and may also inform selection of chemotherapeutic and hormonal treatments. At present, however, the single most important application of HER-2 testing is in the selection of patients for treatment with targeted therapies such as Herceptin. Although, based on current literature, fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) detection of HER-2 gene amplification may provide more accurate information in this context, this method is not yet widely available. Therefore, screening by immunohistochemistry (IHC) for HER-2 protein, backed by rigorous quality controls and FISH testing of equivocal cases with intermediate staining intensity, remains the current practice. In laboratories with highly standardized testing and quality assurance procedures, this protocol appears highly effective. Improvements in fixation procedures, standardization of antibodies, and use of automated image analysis may all increase the precision of IHC testing. However, on the basis of current data, there is a case to be made for the wider implementation of FISH testing to determine HER-2 status in breast cancer. Copyright 2003 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12635130     DOI: 10.1002/path.1354

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pathol        ISSN: 0022-3417            Impact factor:   7.996


  27 in total

1.  Best Practice No 176: Updated recommendations for HER2 testing in the UK.

Authors:  I O Ellis; J Bartlett; M Dowsett; S Humphreys; B Jasani; K Miller; S E Pinder; A Rhodes; R Walker
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 3.411

2.  Comparison of chromogenic in situ hybridization with other methodologies for HER2 status assessment in breast cancer.

Authors:  Cornelia Hauser-Kronberger; Nadia Dandachi
Journal:  J Mol Histol       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 2.611

Review 3.  Virtual microscopy as an enabler of automated/quantitative assessment of protein expression in TMAs.

Authors:  Catherine Conway; Lynne Dobson; Anthony O'Grady; Elaine Kay; Sean Costello; Daniel O'Shea
Journal:  Histochem Cell Biol       Date:  2008-08-05       Impact factor: 4.304

4.  IHC for Her2 with CBE356 antibody is a more accurate predictor of Her2 gene amplification by FISH than HercepTest in breast carcinoma.

Authors:  R Ainsworth; J M S Bartlett; J J Going; E A Mallon; A Forsyth; J Richmond; W Angerson; A Watters; B Dunne
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 3.411

5.  Representational oligonucleotide microarray analysis: a high-resolution method to detect genome copy number variation.

Authors:  Robert Lucito; John Healy; Joan Alexander; Andrew Reiner; Diane Esposito; Maoyen Chi; Linda Rodgers; Amy Brady; Jonathan Sebat; Jennifer Troge; Joseph A West; Seth Rostan; Ken C Q Nguyen; Scott Powers; Kenneth Q Ye; Adam Olshen; Ennapadam Venkatraman; Larry Norton; Michael Wigler
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2003-09-15       Impact factor: 9.043

6.  A simple and reliable pretreatment protocol facilitates fluorescent in situ hybridisation on tissue microarrays of paraffin wax embedded tumour samples.

Authors:  S-F Chin; Y Daigo; H-E Huang; N G Iyer; G Callagy; T Kranjac; M Gonzalez; T Sangan; H Earl; C Caldas
Journal:  Mol Pathol       Date:  2003-10

7.  The epidermal growth factor receptor family in breast cancer.

Authors:  Angelos K Koutras; T R Jeffry Evans
Journal:  Onco Targets Ther       Date:  2008-09-01       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 8.  Testing for HER2-positive breast cancer: a systematic review and cost-effectiveness analysis.

Authors:  Nandini Dendukuri; Karim Khetani; Michelle McIsaac; James Brophy
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2007-05-08       Impact factor: 8.262

9.  Real-time quantitative PCR of microdissected paraffin-embedded breast carcinoma: an alternative method for HER-2/neu analysis.

Authors:  Lise Mette Gjerdrum; Boe Sandahl Sorensen; Eigil Kjeldsen; Flemming Brandt Sorensen; Ebba Nexo; Stephen Hamilton-Dutoit
Journal:  J Mol Diagn       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 5.568

10.  Evaluation of the prognostic and predictive value of HER family mRNA expression in high-risk early breast cancer: a Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group (HeCOG) study.

Authors:  A K Koutras; K T Kalogeras; M-A Dimopoulos; R M Wirtz; U Dafni; E Briasoulis; D Pectasides; H Gogas; C Christodoulou; G Aravantinos; G Zografos; E Timotheadou; P Papakostas; H Linardou; E Razis; T Economopoulos; H P Kalofonos; G Fountzilas
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2008-11-04       Impact factor: 7.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.