Literature DB >> 12635005

Evaluation of relationships between mainstream smoke acetaldehyde and "tar" and carbon monoxide yields in tobacco smoke and reducing sugars in tobacco blends of U.S. commercial cigarettes.

Jeffrey I Seeman1, Susan W Laffoon, Allen J Kassman.   

Abstract

Mainstream (MS) smoke acetaldehyde (AA), carbon monoxide (CO), and "tar" yields and percentage total reducing sugars in the tobacco blends from a Philip Morris USA database of a large number of commercial U.S. cigarettes were analyzed. MS smoke acetaldehyde is significantly correlated with "tar" yield and also with MS smoke carbon monoxide. These correlations are consistent with recently available data, including the 1999 Massachusetts Benchmark Study. MS smoke acetaldehyde yield is not correlated with reducing sugar (RS) concentration in the tobacco blend. For the available data over the time period 1985-1993, the concentration of reducing sugars (mean values for the brands tested) decreased. The correlations found between MS smoke acetaldehyde yield and "tar" and MS smoke carbon monoxide, and the percentage of the variance in AA yield explained by "tar" and MS smoke CO, coupled with the lack of correlation between "tar" normalized MS smoke AA and RS, plus related pyrolysis studies, support the hypothesis that MS smoke acetaldehyde yields are affected more by cigarette design characteristics influencing total smoke production than by tobacco reducing sugars.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12635005     DOI: 10.1080/08958370304461

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Inhal Toxicol        ISSN: 0895-8378            Impact factor:   2.724


  6 in total

Review 1.  Scientific assessment of the use of sugars as cigarette tobacco ingredients: a review of published and other publicly available studies.

Authors:  Ewald Roemer; Matthias K Schorp; Jean-Jacques Piadé; Jeffrey I Seeman; Donald E Leyden; Hans-Juergen Haussmann
Journal:  Crit Rev Toxicol       Date:  2012-01-21       Impact factor: 5.635

2.  Brand variation in oxidant production in mainstream cigarette smoke: Carbonyls and free radicals.

Authors:  Samantha M Reilly; Reema Goel; Neil Trushin; Ryan J Elias; Jonathan Foulds; Joshua Muscat; Jason Liao; John P Richie
Journal:  Food Chem Toxicol       Date:  2017-05-18       Impact factor: 6.023

3.  Analysis of the sucrose synthase gene family in tobacco: structure, phylogeny, and expression patterns.

Authors:  Zhong Wang; Pan Wei; Mingzhu Wu; Yalong Xu; Feng Li; Zhaopeng Luo; Jianfeng Zhang; Ang Chen; Xiaodong Xie; Peijian Cao; Fucheng Lin; Jun Yang
Journal:  Planta       Date:  2015-04-19       Impact factor: 4.116

4.  Carbonyls and Carbon Monoxide Emissions from Electronic Cigarettes Affected by Device Type and Use Patterns.

Authors:  Yeongkwon Son; Chiranjivi Bhattarai; Vera Samburova; Andrey Khlystov
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-04-17       Impact factor: 3.390

5.  An evaluation of sucrose as a possible contaminant in e-liquids for electronic cigarettes by hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Paweł Kubica; Andrzej Wasik; Agata Kot-Wasik; Jacek Namieśnik
Journal:  Anal Bioanal Chem       Date:  2014-03-25       Impact factor: 4.142

6.  Aldehyde and Volatile Organic Compound Yields in Commercial Cigarette Mainstream Smoke Are Mutually Related and Depend on the Sugar and Humectant Content in Tobacco.

Authors:  Jeroen L A Pennings; Johannes W J M Cremers; Mark J A Becker; Walther N M Klerx; Reinskje Talhout
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2020-10-08       Impact factor: 4.244

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.