Literature DB >> 12634543

Abdominal insufflation for prevention of exsanguination.

Jack Sava1, George C Velmahos, Marios Karaiskakis, Paul Kirkman, Konstantinos Toutouzas, Grant Sarkisyan, Linda Chan, Demetrios Demetriades.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Currently, traumatic intra-abdominal hemorrhage continues unchecked during transport and triage, and a simple technique of prehospital hemostasis might improve outcomes. The hemostatic effect of abdominal hypertension has not been studied.
PURPOSE: To examine the effect of iatrogenic abdominal insufflation on blood loss and hemodynamic performance after major abdominal vascular injury.
METHODS: Following laparotomy, a 2.7 mm hole was created in the inferior vena cava of 10 anticoagulated pigs and controlled with a partially occlusive, laparoscopic vascular clamp. After abdominal closure the clamp was released and the pig was randomized to either control (n = 5) or immediate abdominal CO2 insufflation at 20 cm H2O pressure (n = 5). Lactated Ringer's solution was used as needed to maintain a mean arterial pressure of 60 mm Hg. After 15 minutes of hemorrhage and hemodynamic monitoring, the animals were killed and blood loss measured. Mean blood loss was compared between groups using the Student test, as were final values for physiologic variables. Temporal changes in physiologic parameters were compared using analysis of variance.
RESULTS: Mean blood loss was reduced by 61% in insufflated pigs versus controls (695 +/- 244 versus 1764 +/- 328 cc, p < 0.001). Compared with controls, insufflated pigs had significantly higher mean arterial pressure (64 versus 25 mm Hg, p < 0.001), end-tidal CO2 (40.8 versus 17.8 mm Hg, p < 0.001), and pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (10.2 versus 5.8 mm Hg, p = 0.026) immediately before the pigs were killed.
CONCLUSION: Iatrogenic abdominal insufflation significantly decreased blood loss and improved hemodynamics in a porcine model of traumatic venous hemorrhage. Iatrogenic abdominal insufflation may be useful in the prehospital management of abdominal injury.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12634543     DOI: 10.1097/01.TA.0000056162.86054.00

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Trauma        ISSN: 0022-5282


  5 in total

Review 1.  Intravenous hemostats: challenges in translation to patients.

Authors:  Margaret Lashof-Sullivan; Andrew Shoffstall; Erin Lavik
Journal:  Nanoscale       Date:  2013-10-02       Impact factor: 7.790

2.  A systematic review of large animal models of combined traumatic brain injury and hemorrhagic shock.

Authors:  Andrew R Mayer; Andrew B Dodd; Meghan S Vermillion; David D Stephenson; Irshad H Chaudry; Denis E Bragin; Andrew P Gigliotti; Rebecca J Dodd; Benjamin C Wasserott; Priyank Shukla; Rachel Kinsler; Sheila M Alonzo
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2019-06-27       Impact factor: 8.989

3.  Blood oxygenation during hyperpressure intraperitoneal fluid administration in a rabbit model of severe liver injury: Evaluation of a novel concept for control of pre-hospital liver bleeding.

Authors:  Siavash Ahmadi-Noorbakhsh; Saeed Azizi; Bahram Dalir-Naghadeh; Masoud Maham
Journal:  Vet Res Forum       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 1.054

4.  Blood loss during laparoscopic radical prostatectomy - is it significant or not?

Authors:  Sławomir Poletajew; Artur A Antoniewicz
Journal:  Cent European J Urol       Date:  2012-03-19

Review 5.  Prehospital control of life-threatening truncal and junctional haemorrhage is the ultimate challenge in optimizing trauma care; a review of treatment options and their applicability in the civilian trauma setting.

Authors:  S E van Oostendorp; E C T H Tan; L M G Geeraedts
Journal:  Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med       Date:  2016-09-13       Impact factor: 2.953

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.