Literature DB >> 12633794

Percutaneous myocardial laser revascularization in patients with refractory angina pectoris.

Timothy J Gray1, Sharon M Burns, Sarah C Clarke, Sue Tait, Linda D Sharples, Noreen Caine, Peter M Schofield.   

Abstract

This study aimed to determine the safety and efficacy of percutaneous myocardial laser revascularization (PMLR). Seventy-three patients with stable angina pectoris (class III or IV) who were unsuitable for conventional revascularization and had evidence of reversible ischemia by thallium-201 scintigraphy, ejection fraction of > or =25%, and myocardial wall thickness > or =8 mm were randomized to optimal medical therapy alone (n = 37) or PMLR with optimal medical therapy (n = 36). Patients were followed up at 3, 6, and 12 months. The primary end point was exercise time. Secondary end points included angina scores, left ventricular ejection fraction, quality of life, changes in medical therapy, and hospitalizations. All 36 patients randomized to PMLR underwent the procedure successfully with no periprocedure deaths. One patient developed sustained ventricular tachycardia that required electrical cardioversion, and 1 patient developed cardiac tamponade that required surgical drainage. At 12 months, exercise times improved by 109 seconds in the PMLR group but decreased by 62 seconds in the control group (p <0.01). Angina scores improved by 2 classes in 36% of PMLR-treated patients at 12 months compared with 0% of the control patients (p <0.01). We conclude that PMLR is a relatively safe procedure that provides patients with symptomatic angina relief and improvement in exercise capacity and quality of life.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12633794     DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9149(02)03303-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  5 in total

1.  Transmyocardial laser revascularization as an adjunct to coronary artery bypass grafting: a randomized, multicenter study with 4-year follow-up.

Authors:  O H Frazier; Egemen Tuzun; Harald Eichstadt; Steven W Boyce; Allan M Lansing; Robert J March; Michele Sartori; Kamuran A Kadipasaoglu
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  2004

Review 2.  Effectiveness of percutaneous laser revascularization therapy for refractory angina.

Authors:  Michael McGillion; Allison Cook; J Charles Victor; Sandra Carroll; Julie Weston; Kevin Teoh; Heather M Arthur
Journal:  Vasc Health Risk Manag       Date:  2010-09-07

3.  Relationship between the EQ-5D index and measures of clinical outcomes in selected studies of cardiovascular interventions.

Authors:  Kimberley A Goldsmith; Matthew T Dyer; Peter M Schofield; Martin J Buxton; Linda D Sharples
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2009-11-26       Impact factor: 3.186

4.  A study to assess changes in myocardial perfusion after treatment with spinal cord stimulation and percutaneous myocardial laser revascularisation; data from a randomised trial.

Authors:  Sadia N Khan; Duncan C McNab; Linda D Sharples; Carol J Freeman; Ian Hardy; David L Stone; Peter M Schofield
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2008-02-28       Impact factor: 2.279

5.  Clinical and cost-effectiveness analysis of an open label, single-centre, randomised trial of spinal cord stimulation (SCS) versus percutaneous myocardial laser revascularisation (PMR) in patients with refractory angina pectoris: The SPiRiT trial.

Authors:  M T Dyer; K A Goldsmith; S N Khan; L D Sharples; C Freeman; I Hardy; M J Buxton; P M Schofield
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2008-06-30       Impact factor: 2.279

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.