Literature DB >> 12633204

Total nasal reconstruction: utility of the free radial forearm fascial flap.

Catherine P Winslow1, Ted A Cook, Alan Burke, Mark K Wax.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Total nasal defects present daunting challenges to the reconstructive surgeon. The nasal skeleton can be successfully fabricated with bone and cartilage. Reconstruction of the nasal skin with a forehead flap produces an excellent color match for nasal skin. Resurfacing of the internal lining is the most difficult of the 3 layers. Local tissue is often unsatisfactory in amount and/or vascular supply.
METHODS: A patient requiring total nasal reconstruction was prospectively examined. Intraoperative technique was recorded, and postoperative function was determined.
RESULTS: A paramedian forehead flap was used to resurface the external defect. Split calvarium and conchal cartilage were used to reconstruct the nasal skeleton. A fascial flap harvested from the forearm was used to replace the intranasal lining. Turbinate grafts were placed to line the flap. Postoperative breathing was excellent.
CONCLUSIONS: The intranasal portion of a total nasal defect can be successfully reconstructed with a fascial forearm flap. Placement of a turbinate or mucosal graft allows for a thin mucosalized lining with an excellent functional outcome.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12633204     DOI: 10.1001/archfaci.5.2.159

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Facial Plast Surg        ISSN: 1521-2491


  9 in total

1.  Osteocutaneous radial forearm free flap in subtotal nasal reconstruction.

Authors:  Alexander Michael Moore; Jenny Montgomery; Jeremy McMahon; Saghir Sheikh
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2014-11-26

Review 2.  Current strategies in reconstruction of maxillectomy defects.

Authors:  Patricio Andrades; Oleg Militsakh; Matthew M Hanasono; Jana Rieger; Eben L Rosenthal
Journal:  Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2011-08

3.  Interpolated subcutaneous fat pedicle melolabial flap for large nasal lining defects.

Authors:  Garrett R Griffin; Douglas B Chepeha; Jeffrey S Moyer
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2012-09-10       Impact factor: 3.325

Review 4.  Free flap transfer in cranio-maxillofacial surgery: a review of the current data.

Authors:  M Thorwarth; C Eulzer; R Bader; C Wolf; M Schmidt; S Schultze-Mosgau
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2008-09

5.  Reducing nasal morbidity after skull base reconstruction with the nasoseptal flap: free middle turbinate mucosal grafts.

Authors:  Adam J Kimple; W Derek Leight; Stephen A Wheless; Adam M Zanation
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2012-08-01       Impact factor: 3.325

6.  Computer aided-designed, 3-dimensionally printed porous tissue bioscaffolds for craniofacial soft tissue reconstruction.

Authors:  David A Zopf; Anna G Mitsak; Colleen L Flanagan; Matthew Wheeler; Glenn E Green; Scott J Hollister
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2014-10-03       Impact factor: 3.497

7.  Nose Reconstruction Using Local and Regional Flaps: The Challenges and Advantages.

Authors:  Venkatesh Mysore Srinivas; Manjunath Kalapurmat Nagabhushanaiah
Journal:  J Cutan Aesthet Surg       Date:  2021 Jan-Mar

8.  Reconstructive Approach to an Acquired Absence of Multiple Facial Components: A Case Report.

Authors:  Lauren N Oliver; Kongkrit Chaiyasate
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2016-10-28

9.  Preventing nasal airway collapse with irradiated homologous costal cartilage versus expanded polytetrafluoroethylene: a novel animal model for nasal airway reconstruction.

Authors:  Cheng-I Yen; Jonathan A Zelken; Chun-Shin Chang; Hung-Chang Chen; Shih-Yi Yang; Shu-Yin Chang; Jui-Yung Yang; Shiow-Shuh Chuang; Yen-Chang Hsiao
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-04-30       Impact factor: 4.379

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.