Literature DB >> 12632806

Predictable surprises: the disasters you should have seen coming.

Michael D Watkins1, Max H Bazerman.   

Abstract

Think hard about the problems in your organization or about potential upheavals in the markets in which you operate. Could some of those problems--ones no one is attending to--turn into disasters? If you're like most executives, you'll sheepishly answer yes. As Harvard Business School professors Michael Watkins and Max Bazerman illustrate in this timely article, most of the "unexpected" events that buffet companies should have been anticipated--they're "predictable surprises." Such disasters take many forms, from financial scandals to disruptions in operations, from organizational upheavals to product failures. Some result in short-term losses or distractions, while others cause damage that takes years to repair. Some are truly catastrophic--the events of September 11, 2001, are a tragic example of a predictable surprise. The bad news is that all companies, including your own, are vulnerable to predictable surprises. The good news is that recent research helps explain why that's so and what companies can do to minimize their risk. The authors contend that organizations' inability to prepare for predictable surprises can be traced to three sets of vulnerabilities: psychological, organizational, and political. To address these vulnerabilities, the authors recommend the RPM approach. More than just the usual environmental scanning and contingency planning, RPM requires a chain of actions--recognizing, prioritizing, and mobilizing--that companies must meticulously adhere to. Failure to apply any one of these steps, the authors say, can leave an organization vulnerable. Given the extraordinarily high stakes involved, it should be every business leader's core responsibility to apply the RPM approach, the authors conclude.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12632806

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Harv Bus Rev        ISSN: 0017-8012


  3 in total

1.  Banning all drug promotion is the best option pending major reforms.

Authors:  Peter R Mansfield
Journal:  J Bioeth Inq       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 1.352

2.  Those who do not move, do not notice their (supply) chains-inconvenient lessons from disruptions related to COVID-19.

Authors:  Ettore Settanni
Journal:  AI Soc       Date:  2020-06-04

3.  Behavioral Ethics and the Incidence of Foodborne Illness Outbreaks.

Authors:  Harvey S James; Michelle S Segovia
Journal:  J Agric Environ Ethics       Date:  2020-11-16       Impact factor: 2.367

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.