Literature DB >> 12632277

[Complication rate after thoracoscopic and conventional lobectomy].

Beatrix Hoksch1, B Ablassmaier, M Walter, J M Müller.   

Abstract

AIM: To determine whether a thoracoscopic lobectomy used for treatment of primary non-small cell lung cancer shows a higher or lower morbidity in comparison to the conventional resection (thoracotomy) postoperatively.
METHODOLOGY: 42 patients with the presumption diagnosis of a lung cancer received a thoracoscopic lobectomy (n=28) or a conventional lobectomy (n=14). Postoperative complication rate (30 days) was analysed prospectively. There were no differences between the groups referring to age, co-morbidity, localisation of the tumor and stage.
RESULTS: Patients with a conventional operation revealed a significant higher morbidity in comparison to the patients of the thoracoscopic group (50 % vs. 14.2 %, p=0.03).
CONCLUSION: The thoracoscopic lobectomy represents a safe operation method and an alternative to the conventional operation (thoracotomy).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12632277     DOI: 10.1055/s-2003-37763

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Zentralbl Chir        ISSN: 0044-409X            Impact factor:   0.942


  11 in total

1.  Outcomes of a hybrid technique for video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) pulmonary resection in a community setting.

Authors:  Roger H Kim; Kazuaki Takabe; Charles G Lockhart
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 2.895

2.  A hybrid technique: video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) pulmonary resections for community-based surgeons.

Authors:  Roger H Kim; Kazuaki Takabe; Charles G Lockhart
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-07-08       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Robotic resection of stage III lung cancer: an international retrospective study.

Authors:  Monica Casiraghi; Lorenzo Spaggiari
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 2.895

4.  Comparison of costs for video-assisted thoracic surgery lobectomy and open lobectomy for non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Sukki Cho; Young Woo Do; Eung Bae Lee
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-09-11       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  ["Fast-track" rehabilitation in thoracic surgery. First experiences with a multimodal, interdisciplinary, and proven perioperative treatment course].

Authors:  J I Gregor; W Schwenk; J Mall; M Kilian; C Spies; A Bloch; J M Müller; J C Rückert
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 0.955

Review 6.  Robotic assisted lobectomy for locally advanced lung cancer.

Authors:  Giulia Veronesi; Pierluigi Novellis; Orazio Difrancesco; Mark Dylewski
Journal:  J Vis Surg       Date:  2017-06-04

7.  Conversion during thoracoscopic lobectomy: related factors and learning curve impact.

Authors:  David E Smith; Agustin Dietrich; Matias Nicolas; Alejandro Da Lozzo; Enrique Beveraggi
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2015-11-11

Review 8.  Video-Assisted versus Open Lobectomy in Patients with Compromised Lung Function: A Literature Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Ruoyu Zhang; Mark K Ferguson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-07-06       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Video-assisted thoracic surgery in hemothorax evacuation after cardiac surgery or cardiac interventions.

Authors:  Aladdin Bashir; Omar Daraghma; Zbigniew Brzeziński; Dawid Imiełowski; Piotr Daszkiewicz; Witold Gwoźdź; Jerzy Stupała; Paweł Tomaszewski; Jacek Kaperczak
Journal:  Kardiochir Torakochirurgia Pol       Date:  2017-09-30

10.  Video-assisted thoracic bronchial sleeve lobectomy with bronchoplasty for treatment of lung cancer confined to a single lung lobe: a case series of Chinese patients.

Authors:  Daping Yu; Yi Han; Shijie Zhou; Xiaoyun Song; Yunsong Li; Ning Xiao; Zhidong Liu
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2014-04-04       Impact factor: 1.637

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.