Otto Eichelbrönner1, William J Sibbald, Ian H Chin-Yee. 1. A.C. Burton Vascular Biology Laboratory, London Health Sciences Centre, University of Western Ontario, 800 Commissoners Road East, London, Ontario N6A 4G5, Canada.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effects of different conditions of flow on endotoxin induced adhesion of human red blood cells (RBC) to human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVEC). DESIGN AND SETTING: Prospective, randomized, controlled in vitro study in a university-affiliated cell biology laboratory. SUBJECTS. Human erythrocytes, human vascular endothelial cells. INTERVENTIONS: Superfusion of HUVEC monolayers with human erythrocytes incubated with either saline (CON) or endotoxin (ETX) with different flow pattern (basic flow rates of 0.65 or 1.3 ml/min; intermittent flow, IMF). The CON/0.6, CON/1.3, CON-IMF/1.3 ( n=7/group) groups served as control, and in test groups ETX/0.6, ETX/1.3, ETX-IMF/0.6, and ETX-IMF/1.3 ( n=7/group) both RBC and HUVECs were incubated with ETX and flow pattern and rates varied. In the IMF experiments flow rates of 0.65 and 1.3 ml/min were combined with stop-and-go flow pattern. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: At continuous flow of 0.65 ml/min erythrocyte adhesion was 61+/-5 cells/mm(2) in CON and 172+/-25 cells/mm(2) after ETX. When flow rate was increased to 1.3 ml/min, adhesion decreased to 27+/-4 cells/mm(2) in CON and 93+/-18 cells/mm(2) after ETX. IMF conditions had no effect on RBC adhesion of naive RBC but increased the number of adhesive erythrocytes after incubation with ETX both at 0.65 ml/min (287+/-33 cells/mm(2)) and at 1.3 ml/min (148+/-13 cells/mm(2)). CONCLUSIONS: RBC adhesion to vascular endothelium is affected by rate and pattern of blood flow. Higher flow rates or shear forces reduce RBC adhesion while stop-and-go flow pattern favored adhesion of ETX-treated erythrocytes to HUVECs. These findings suggest that altered RBCs interact with altered flow patterns potentially contributing to the microcirculatory injury observed in sepsis.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effects of different conditions of flow on endotoxin induced adhesion of human red blood cells (RBC) to human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVEC). DESIGN AND SETTING: Prospective, randomized, controlled in vitro study in a university-affiliated cell biology laboratory. SUBJECTS. Human erythrocytes, human vascular endothelial cells. INTERVENTIONS: Superfusion of HUVEC monolayers with human erythrocytes incubated with either saline (CON) or endotoxin (ETX) with different flow pattern (basic flow rates of 0.65 or 1.3 ml/min; intermittent flow, IMF). The CON/0.6, CON/1.3, CON-IMF/1.3 ( n=7/group) groups served as control, and in test groups ETX/0.6, ETX/1.3, ETX-IMF/0.6, and ETX-IMF/1.3 ( n=7/group) both RBC and HUVECs were incubated with ETX and flow pattern and rates varied. In the IMF experiments flow rates of 0.65 and 1.3 ml/min were combined with stop-and-go flow pattern. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: At continuous flow of 0.65 ml/min erythrocyte adhesion was 61+/-5 cells/mm(2) in CON and 172+/-25 cells/mm(2) after ETX. When flow rate was increased to 1.3 ml/min, adhesion decreased to 27+/-4 cells/mm(2) in CON and 93+/-18 cells/mm(2) after ETX. IMF conditions had no effect on RBC adhesion of naive RBC but increased the number of adhesive erythrocytes after incubation with ETX both at 0.65 ml/min (287+/-33 cells/mm(2)) and at 1.3 ml/min (148+/-13 cells/mm(2)). CONCLUSIONS: RBC adhesion to vascular endothelium is affected by rate and pattern of blood flow. Higher flow rates or shear forces reduce RBC adhesion while stop-and-go flow pattern favored adhesion of ETX-treated erythrocytes to HUVECs. These findings suggest that altered RBCs interact with altered flow patterns potentially contributing to the microcirculatory injury observed in sepsis.
Authors: Y M Fong; M A Marano; L L Moldawer; H Wei; S E Calvano; J S Kenney; A C Allison; A Cerami; G T Shires; S F Lowry Journal: J Clin Invest Date: 1990-06 Impact factor: 14.808
Authors: Edward Abraham; Peter Andrews; Massimo Antonelli; Laurent Brochard; Christian Brun-Buisson; Geoffrey Dobb; Jean-Yves Fagon; Johan Groeneveld; Jordi Mancebo; Philipp Metnitz; Stefano Nava; Michael Pinsky; Peter Radermacher; Marco Ranieri; Christian Richard; Robert Tasker; Benoît Vallet Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2004-05-15 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: Christian Laplace; Olivier Huet; Eric Vicaut; Catherine Ract; Laurent Martin; Dan Benhamou; Jacques Duranteau Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2005-07-28 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: Yasmina Serroukh; Sarah Djebara; Christophe Lelubre; Karim Zouaoui Boudjeltia; Patrick Biston; Michael Piagnerelli Journal: Crit Care Res Pract Date: 2012-05-21