Literature DB >> 12631217

Simultaneous carcinoma of the endometrium and ovary vs endometrial carcinoma with ovarian metastases: a clinical and immunohistochemical determination.

R Halperin1, S Zehavi, E Hadas, L Habler, I Bukovsky, D Schneider.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to perform a clinical and immunohistochemical comparison between simultaneous independent tumors involving endometrium and ovary and metastatic endometrial tumors, and to try to find clinical and /or immunohistochemical parameters differentiating between these two entities. Sixteen cases of simultaneous independent primaries of endometrium and ovary, presenting the same histologic type, were compared with 12 cases of primary endometrial cancer, demonstrating ovarian metastases. The comparison related to patients' characteristics and immunohistochemical expression of estrogen and progesterone receptors (ER,PR), bcl-2, HER-2 /neu, p53, and cell proliferation marker Ki-67 in endometrial and ovarian tumors. The only clinical parameter differentiating significantly between the groups was the prevalence of familial cancer, being more frequent in the group of metastatic tumors (P = 0.03). Immunohistochemical analysis demonstrated the same immunostaining in endometrium and ovary for all immunohistochemical parameters in cases of metastatic endometrial cancer. Conversely, 62.5% of cases with simultaneous tumors of endometrium and ovary could be differentiated from metastatic tumors by distinct immunohistochemical expression of ER and PR in endometrial and ovarian tumors (P = 0.0006), and 31.3% of cases could be differentiated by distinct immunostaining for bcl-2 (P = 0.03). Immunohistochemical parameters HER-2 /neu, p53 and Ki-67 were not appropriate for the distinction between the two study groups. We conclude that the application of immunohistochemical analysis may play an important role in the differentiation between cases of simultaneous independent carcinomas of endometrium and ovary vs. cases of endometrial carcinoma with ovarian metastases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12631217     DOI: 10.1046/j.1525-1438.2003.13025.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Gynecol Cancer        ISSN: 1048-891X            Impact factor:   3.437


  6 in total

1.  Differential vimentin expression in ovarian and uterine corpus endometrioid adenocarcinomas: diagnostic utility in distinguishing double primaries from metastatic tumors.

Authors:  Mohamed M Desouki; Sarah J Kallas; Dineo Khabele; Marta A Crispens; Omar Hameed; Oluwole Fadare
Journal:  Int J Gynecol Pathol       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 2.762

2.  Endometrial Cancer: Comparison of Patients with Synchronous Primary Carcinoma of the Endometrium and Ovary vs. Endometrial Carcinoma with Ovarian Metastases.

Authors:  I Juhasz-Böss; T Fehm; S Becker; R Rothmund; B Krämer; A Staebler; D Wallwiener; E F Solomayer
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2012-08-16       Impact factor: 2.915

Review 3.  Coexistence of homologous-type cervical carcinosarcoma with endometrioid-type G1 endometrial cancer: a case report with an immunohistochemical study.

Authors:  Andrzej Semczuk; Eva Colas; Beata Walczyna; Maciej Joźwik; Andrzej Pyra; Anna Semczuk-Sikora; Tomasz Rechberger
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Pathol       Date:  2014-09-15

4.  Clinicopathological characteristics of patients with synchronous primary endometrial and ovarian cancers: A review of 43 cases.

Authors:  Yuantao Liu; Jun Li; Hongyan Jin; Ying Lu; Xin Lu
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2012-09-27       Impact factor: 2.967

5.  The Association between Primary Endometrioid Carcinoma of the Ovary and Synchronous Malignancy of the Endometrium.

Authors:  Catharina C van Niekerk; Johan Bulten; G Peter Vooijs; André L M Verbeek
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Int       Date:  2009-12-15

Review 6.  Potential for Mitochondrial DNA Sequencing in the Differential Diagnosis of Gynaecological Malignancies.

Authors:  Anna Myriam Perrone; Giulia Girolimetti; Martina Procaccini; Lorena Marchio; Alessandra Livi; Giulia Borghese; Anna Maria Porcelli; Pierandrea De Iaco; Giuseppe Gasparre
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2018-07-13       Impact factor: 5.923

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.