Literature DB >> 12630883

Charge-transfer mechanism for electrophilic aromatic nitration and nitrosation via the convergence of (ab initio) molecular-orbital and Marcus-Hush theories with experiments.

Steven R Gwaltney1, Sergiy V Rosokha, Martin Head-Gordon, Jay K Kochi.   

Abstract

The highly disparate rates of aromatic nitrosation and nitration, despite the very similar (electrophilic) properties of the active species: NO(+) and NO(2)(+) in Chart 1, are quantitatively reconciled. First, the thorough mappings of the potential-energy surfaces by high level (ab initio) molecular-orbital methodologies involving extensive coupled-cluster CCSD(T)/6-31G optimizations establish the intervention of two reactive intermediates in nitration (Figure 8) but only one in nitrosation (Figure 7). Second, the same distinctive topologies involving double and single potential-energy minima (Figures 6 and 5) also emerge from the semiquantitative application of the Marcus-Hush theory to the transient spectral data. Such a striking convergence from quite different theoretical approaches indicates that the molecular-orbital and Marcus-Hush (potential-energy) surfaces are conceptually interchangeable. In the resultant charge-transfer mechanism, the bimolecular interactions of arene donors with both NO(+) and NO(2)(+) spontaneously lead (barrierless) to pi-complexes in which electron transfer is concurrent with complexation. Such a pi-complex in nitration is rapidly converted to the sigma-complex, whereas this Wheland adduct in nitrosation merely represents a high energy (transition-state) structure. Marcus-Hush analysis thus demonstrates how the strongly differentiated (arene) reactivities toward NO(+) and NO(2)(+) can actually be exploited in the quantitative development of a single coherent (electron-transfer) mechanism for both aromatic nitrosation and nitration.

Entities:  

Year:  2003        PMID: 12630883     DOI: 10.1021/ja021152s

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Chem Soc        ISSN: 0002-7863            Impact factor:   15.419


  7 in total

1.  Organic chemistry as representation.

Authors:  Eamonn F Healy
Journal:  Found Chem       Date:  2020-07-06       Impact factor: 1.263

2.  On the construction of diabatic and adiabatic potential energy surfaces based on ab initio valence bond theory.

Authors:  Lingchun Song; Jiali Gao
Journal:  J Phys Chem A       Date:  2008-12-18       Impact factor: 2.781

3.  Arenium ions are not obligatory intermediates in electrophilic aromatic substitution.

Authors:  Boris Galabov; Gergana Koleva; Svetlana Simova; Boriana Hadjieva; Henry F Schaefer; Paul von Ragué Schleyer
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-06-27       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Mechanism and regioselectivity of electrophilic aromatic nitration in solution: the validity of the transition state approach.

Authors:  Magnus Liljenberg; Joakim Halldin Stenlid; Tore Brinck
Journal:  J Mol Model       Date:  2017-12-18       Impact factor: 1.810

5.  Energetics of Electron Pairs in Electrophilic Aromatic Substitutions.

Authors:  Julen Munárriz; Miguel Gallegos; Julia Contreras-García; Ángel Martín Pendás
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2021-01-19       Impact factor: 4.411

6.  Observation of replacement of carbon in benzene with nitrogen in a low-temperature plasma.

Authors:  Zhiping Zhang; Xiaoyun Gong; Sichun Zhang; Haijun Yang; Youmin Shi; Chengdui Yang; Xinrong Zhang; Xingchuang Xiong; Xiang Fang; Zheng Ouyang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2013-12-11       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  How Do Aromatic Nitro Compounds React with Nucleophiles? Theoretical Description Using Aromaticity, Nucleophilicity and Electrophilicity Indices.

Authors:  Kacper Błaziak; Witold Danikiewicz; Mieczysław Mąkosza
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2020-10-20       Impact factor: 4.411

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.