Literature DB >> 12630529

Endothelium-dependent vasodilation in the skin microcirculation of patients with septic shock.

Sandrine Kubli1, Yann Boëgli, Anne Dalle Ave, Lucas Liaudet, Jean-Pierre Revelly, Sandrine Golay, Alain Broccard, Bernard Waeber, Marie-Denise Schaller, François Feihl.   

Abstract

The evidence for endothelial dysfunction in sepsis is mostly restricted to animal models. We investigated endothelial function in the skin microcirculation of eight patients hospitalized for septic shock in an intensive care unit (ICU). All patients required adrenergic support. Twelve hemodynamically stable ICU patients without sepsis who did not receive any vasoactive medication were used as controls. The two groups were of similar age and sex ratio. For additional reference, 16 healthy, nonsmoking subjects matched for age and sex to the first two groups were also studied. The evaluation of endothelial function was based on the comparison of skin blood flow responses to iontophoretically applied acetylcholine (Ach, an endothelium-dependent vasodilator) and sodium nitroprusside (SNP, an endothelium-independent vasodilator). Skin blood flow was measured on the volar face of the forearm using laser Doppler imaging. Before application of Ach or SNP, the mean baseline skin blood flow was below 100 perfusion units (PU) in all subjects and did not differ between groups. The maximal increase in blood flow elicited by both agents was significantly depressed in the patients with sepsis (Ach: 167 +/- 63 PU; SNP: 138 +/- 34 PU, mean +/- SD) compared with the ICU control patients (Ach: 291 +/- 135 PU, P < 0.05; SNP: 261 +/- 121 PU, P < 0.01) and the healthy, nonsmoking groups (Ach: 336 +/- 98 PU, P < 0.01; SNP: 304 +/- 81 PU, P < 0.01). The ratio of responses to Ach and SNP did not significantly differ between groups (septic: 1.22 +/- 0.40; ICU control 1.18 +/- 0.46, healthy, nonsmoking 1.12 +/- 0.24, P = 0.86). Thus, sepsis was not associated with a selective depression of the endothelium-dependent response. These results suggest that the capacity of the endothelium to produce signals for vasorelaxation remains intact in the skin microcirculation of patients with septic shock.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12630529     DOI: 10.1097/00024382-200303000-00013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Shock        ISSN: 1073-2322            Impact factor:   3.454


  11 in total

1.  Inter-α-inhibitor Ameliorates Endothelial Inflammation in Sepsis.

Authors:  Vandy P Stober; Yow-Pin Lim; Steven Opal; Lisheng Zhuo; Koji Kimata; Stavros Garantziotis
Journal:  Lung       Date:  2019-04-26       Impact factor: 2.584

2.  The prognostic value of muscle StO2 in septic patients.

Authors:  Jacques Creteur; Tiziana Carollo; Giulia Soldati; Gustavo Buchele; Daniel De Backer; Jean-Louis Vincent
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2007-06-16       Impact factor: 17.440

3.  Association between endothelial dysfunction and acute brain dysfunction during critical illness.

Authors:  Christopher G Hughes; Alessandro Morandi; Timothy D Girard; Bernhard Riedel; Jennifer L Thompson; Ayumi K Shintani; Brenda T Pun; E Wesley Ely; Pratik P Pandharipande
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 7.892

4.  Endothelial-Dependent Responses Correlate with Pediatric SOFA Scores During Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock.

Authors:  Ryan J Stark
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Transl Res       Date:  2022-01-17       Impact factor: 3.216

5.  Impaired vascular reactivity in sepsis - a systematic review with meta-analysis.

Authors:  Sigita Kazune; Anda Piebalga; Eva Strike; Indulis Vanags
Journal:  Arch Med Sci Atheroscler Dis       Date:  2019-07-18

6.  Impaired Microvascular Function in Patients With Critical COVID-19.

Authors:  Patrik Gille-Johnson; Irene Kessler; Sara Tehrani
Journal:  Crit Care Explor       Date:  2022-02-17

7.  Sepsis-associated microvascular dysfunction measured by peripheral arterial tonometry: an observational study.

Authors:  Joshua S Davis; Tsin W Yeo; Jane H Thomas; Mark McMillan; Christabelle J Darcy; Yvette R McNeil; Allen C Cheng; David S Celermajer; Dianne P Stephens; Nicholas M Anstey
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2009-09-25       Impact factor: 9.097

8.  Epidermal wound healing in severe sepsis and septic shock in humans.

Authors:  Marjo Koskela; Fiia Gäddnäs; Tero I Ala-Kokko; Jouko J Laurila; Juha Saarnio; Aarne Oikarinen; Vesa Koivukangas
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2009-06-24       Impact factor: 9.097

9.  Endothelial dysfunction is a potential contributor to multiple organ failure and mortality in aged mice subjected to septic shock: preclinical studies in a murine model of cecal ligation and puncture.

Authors:  Ciro Coletta; Katalin Módis; Gábor Oláh; Attila Brunyánszki; Daniela S Herzig; Edward R Sherwood; Zoltán Ungvári; Csaba Szabo
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2014-09-16       Impact factor: 9.097

10.  Perfusion index for assessing microvascular reactivity in septic shock after fluid resuscitation.

Authors:  Igor Alexandre Côrtes Menezes; Cláudio Leinig Pereira da Cunha; Hipólito Carraro Júnior; Alain Marcio Luy
Journal:  Rev Bras Ter Intensiva       Date:  2018 Apr-Jun
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.