Literature DB >> 12630407

Are there gender differences in self-reported smoking practices? Correlation with thiocyanate and cotinine levels in smokers and nonsmokers from the Pawtucket Heart Health Program.

Annlouise R Assaf1, Donna Parker, Kate L Lapane, Joyce L McKenney, Richard A Carleton.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This study compared serum cotinine and thiocyanate in assessment of self-reported smoking behavior among 1400 men and 1809 women from two New England communities.
METHODS: Serum thiocyanate and serum cotinine levels were analyzed on 2411 and 798 survey respondents, respectively, in an attempt to provide an objective measurement for validation of self-reported smoking behaviors that were obtained through an in-home interviewer-administered questionnaire. Cross-sectional household surveys were conducted with randomly selected men and women, aged 18-65, between 1981 and 1993 as part of the evaluation of the Pawtucket Heart Health Program.
RESULTS: Among smokers, the thiocyanate test had similar rates of agreement for women(88.0%) and for men (89.3%). However, among nonsmokers, thiocyanate had higher rates of agreement for women (91.5%) than for men (85.2%). For cotinine, the rates of agreement among smokers were higher for women (91.6%) than for men (89.7%). Similarly, the rates of agreement among nonsmokers were also higher for women (93.9%) than for men (91.9%). Overall,serum cotinine had a higher concordance rate than serum thiocyanate for both men and women.
CONCLUSIONS: Although our results suggested that there were some differences in self-reporting of smoking status by gender, results were quite similar between self-reports of smoking and both biochemical tests. The results obtained from this large population-based study from two New England communities lend credibility to the use of self-reports as a low-cost accurate approach to obtaining information on smoking behaviors among both men and women in large population-based health surveys.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12630407     DOI: 10.1089/154099902762203731

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)        ISSN: 1540-9996            Impact factor:   2.681


  20 in total

1.  Is some provider advice on smoking cessation better than no advice? An instrumental variable analysis of the 2001 National Health Interview Survey.

Authors:  Yuhua Bao; Naihua Duan; Sarah A Fox
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  Cigarette smoking and risk of meningioma: the effect of gender.

Authors:  Elizabeth B Claus; Kyle M Walsh; Lisa Calvocoressi; Melissa L Bondy; Joellen M Schildkraut; Margaret Wrensch; Joseph L Wiemels
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2012-04-02       Impact factor: 4.254

3.  Sex/Gender Differences in Cotinine Levels Among Daily Smokers in the Pennsylvania Adult Smoking Study.

Authors:  Allshine Chen; Nicolle M Krebs; Junjia Zhu; Dongxiao Sun; Andrea Stennett; Joshua E Muscat
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2017-09-05       Impact factor: 2.681

4.  Cigarette smoking and endometrial carcinoma risk: the role of effect modification and tumor heterogeneity.

Authors:  Ashley S Felix; Hannah P Yang; Gretchen L Gierach; Yikyung Park; Louise A Brinton
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2014-02-01       Impact factor: 2.506

5.  Association between smoking and risk of bladder cancer among men and women.

Authors:  Neal D Freedman; Debra T Silverman; Albert R Hollenbeck; Arthur Schatzkin; Christian C Abnet
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2011-08-17       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 6.  Reconciling human smoking behavior and machine smoking patterns: implications for understanding smoking behavior and the impact on laboratory studies.

Authors:  Catalin Marian; Richard J O'Connor; Mirjana V Djordjevic; Vaughan W Rees; Dorothy K Hatsukami; Peter G Shields
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 4.254

7.  Home and workplace smoking bans in Italy, Ireland, Sweden, France and the Czech Republic.

Authors:  J E Heck; I Stücker; S Allwright; E R Gritz; M Haglund; C G Healton; E Kralikova; S Sanchez Del Mazo; E Tamang; C M Dresler; M Hashibe
Journal:  Eur Respir J       Date:  2009-11-19       Impact factor: 16.671

8.  Accuracy of self-reported tobacco use in newly diagnosed cancer patients.

Authors:  Nelson A Morales; Michelle A Romano; K Michael Cummings; James R Marshall; Andrew J Hyland; Alan Hutson; Graham W Warren
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2013-04-04       Impact factor: 2.506

9.  Assessing tobacco use in an African population: Serum and urine cotinine cut-offs from South Africa.

Authors:  Lisa J Ware; Karen Charlton; Ruan Kruger; Yolandi Breet; Johannes van Rooyen; Hugo Huisman; Shani Botha; Aletta S Uys; Kirsten L Rennie; Nirmala Naidoo; Paul Kowal; Aletta E Schutte
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2018-12-21       Impact factor: 4.492

10.  A Prospective Investigation of Coffee Drinking and Bladder Cancer Incidence in the United States.

Authors:  Erikka Loftfield; Neal D Freedman; Maki Inoue-Choi; Barry I Graubard; Rashmi Sinha
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 4.822

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.