Literature DB >> 12629365

A prospective controlled quantitative study of ultrastructural changes in the underactive detrusor.

R D Brierly1, R G Hindley, E McLarty, D M Harding, P J Thomas.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We quantify and compare ultrastructural changes seen at high power on electron microscopic examination of detrusor biopsies from underactive and control bladders.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The detrusor underactivity group consisted of 14 patients (mean age 64.0 years) with post-micturition residuals greater than 300 ml., impaired contractility and no obstruction on urodynamics. A total of 17 patients who voided normally voiders with residual volume less than 50 ml. served as the control group. Bladder biopsies were obtained endoscopically using cold cup technique and processed using standard methods. All specimens were randomized and studied at high power (x12,000 to x24,000) by an examiner who was blinded to the groups. All complete cells within each random grid field were counted up to a total of 500. The number of disrupted cells per 500 cells was noted.
RESULTS: Disruptive cell profiles were found in all biopsies. Median cell count was 20 cells/500 in 14 controls and 96.5 cells/500 in the underactive detrusor group (p <0.001). The number of disruptive cell profiles did not correlate with age in the control group (r = 0.34, p = 0.18).
CONCLUSIONS: There were distinct morphological changes in the detrusor associated with bladder dysfunction with approximately 4 times more disruptive cells in patients with an underactive bladder. However, there was no correlation between age and number of disruptive cells, suggesting that this is not a process of aging per se. Ultrastructure studies may have a role as an adjunct to urodynamics in the diagnosis of bladder dysfunction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12629365     DOI: 10.1097/01.ju.0000055781.07630.aa

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  21 in total

Review 1.  Underactive Bladder.

Authors:  Himanshu Aggarwal; Philippe E Zimmern
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 3.092

2.  The effects of neuromodulation in a novel obese-prone rat model of detrusor underactivity.

Authors:  Eric J Gonzalez; Warren M Grill
Journal:  Am J Physiol Renal Physiol       Date:  2017-06-21

3.  A new look at detrusor underactivity: impaired contractility versus afferent dysfunction.

Authors:  Anne M Suskind; Phillip P Smith
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 3.092

4.  The Impact of Duration of Complaints on Successful Outcome of Sacral Neuromodulation.

Authors:  Ranjana Jairam; Jamie Drossaerts; Gommert van Koeveringe; Philip van Kerrebroeck
Journal:  Urol Int       Date:  2017-05-06       Impact factor: 2.089

Review 5.  Voiding dysfunction due to detrusor underactivity: an overview.

Authors:  Marcus J Drake; Jonathan Williams; Dominika A Bijos
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2014-07-08       Impact factor: 14.432

Review 6.  Pathophysiology and animal modeling of underactive bladder.

Authors:  Pradeep Tyagi; Phillip P Smith; George A Kuchel; William C de Groat; Lori A Birder; Christopher J Chermansky; Rosalyn M Adam; Vincent Tse; Michael B Chancellor; Naoki Yoshimura
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2014-09-20       Impact factor: 2.370

7.  The significance of bladder trabeculation in the female lower urinary system: an objective evaluation by urodynamic studies.

Authors:  Sang Wook Bai; Soo Hyeon Park; Da Jung Chung; Joo Hyun Park; Jong Seung Shin; Sei Kwang Kim; Ki Hyun Park
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2005-10-31       Impact factor: 2.759

Review 8.  Contemporary concepts in the aetiopathogenesis of detrusor underactivity.

Authors:  Nadir I Osman; Christopher R Chapple
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2014-10-21       Impact factor: 14.432

9.  Ultrasound detrusor wall thickness measurement in combination with bladder capacity can safely detect detrusor underactivity in adult men.

Authors:  Kevin L J Rademakers; Gommert A van Koeveringe; Matthias Oelke
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2016-07-22       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 10.  [Ultrastructural changes in the aging bladder].

Authors:  A Haferkamp; A Elbadawi
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 0.639

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.