Literature DB >> 12628871

Use of the urine color test to monitor compliance with isoniazid treatment of latent tuberculosis infection.

Tal Eidlitz-Markus1, Avraham Zeharia, Gerald Baum, Marc Mimouni, Jacob Amir.   

Abstract

STUDY
OBJECTIVE: To apply the Arkansas color method in order to evaluate drug compliance and factors that can predict treatment adherence in patients being treated for latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) with a single daily dose of isoniazid (INH).
DESIGN: Prospective study of adherence of 105 patients aged 1 to 75 years who were treated with a single daily dose of INH for LTBI.
INTERVENTIONS: Patients or their parents were interviewed regarding parameters that may affect compliance. Urine samples were collected and tested for INH metabolites with the Arkansas color method.
RESULTS: Nonadherence to treatment was found in 28.5% of patients. There was no statistically significant correlation among the following parameters: gender; age; diagnosis; mode of administration (self or parents); duration of treatment; dose of INH per weight; or interval since last intake of dose. Twenty-six patients were randomly checked for treatment adherence on two separate visits, and nonadherent patients were informed immediately and their condition was fully explained to them. Five of six patients who were nonadherent in the first visit and were examined twice became adherent in the second visit. Three of 20 patients who were adherent in the first visit became nonadherent.
CONCLUSION: Almost one third of the patients who received LTBI treatment with INH were nonadherent to treatment. No factor was found to predict adherence. The Arkansas method can be used by the family physician and is a simple, immediate method to follow-up patients with LTBI who are treated with INH.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12628871     DOI: 10.1378/chest.123.3.736

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chest        ISSN: 0012-3692            Impact factor:   9.410


  7 in total

Review 1.  Use of electronic monitoring in clinical nursing research.

Authors:  Rita L Ailinger; Patricia L Black; Natalie Lima-Garcia
Journal:  Clin Nurs Res       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 2.075

Review 2.  What are validated self-report adherence scales really measuring?: a systematic review.

Authors:  Thi-My-Uyen Nguyen; Adam La Caze; Neil Cottrell
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 4.335

3.  The reliability and practicality of the Arkansas method assay of isoniazid adherence.

Authors:  Katharine E Schmitz; Melbourne F Hovell; Charlene A Wong; Norma J Kelley; Donata Nilsen; Elaine J Blumberg; Linda L Hill; Carol L Sipan; Bo Kolody; Dale A Chatfield
Journal:  Clin Nurs Res       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 2.075

4.  Point-of-care Arkansas method for measuring adherence to treatment with isoniazid.

Authors:  Renata L Guerra; Marcus B Conde; Anne Efron; Carla Loredo; Gisele Bastos; Richard E Chaisson; Jonathan E Golub
Journal:  Respir Med       Date:  2010-03-03       Impact factor: 3.415

5.  Adherence with isoniazid for prevention of tuberculosis among HIV-infected adults in South Africa.

Authors:  Tom A Szakacs; Douglas Wilson; D William Cameron; Michael Clark; Paul Kocheleff; F James Muller; Anne E McCarthy
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2006-06-13       Impact factor: 3.090

6.  Urine Biomarker Assessment of Infant Adherence to Isoniazid Prophylaxis.

Authors:  Sylvia M LaCourse; Daniel Leon; Nuttada Panpradist; Barbra A Richardson; Elizabeth Maleche-Obimbo; Jerphason Mecha; Daniel Matemo; Jaclyn N Escudero; John Kinuthia; Barry Lutz; Grace John-Stewart
Journal:  Pediatr Infect Dis J       Date:  2021-01       Impact factor: 2.129

7.  The challenge of patient adherence.

Authors:  Leslie R Martin; Summer L Williams; Kelly B Haskard; M Robin Dimatteo
Journal:  Ther Clin Risk Manag       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 2.423

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.