PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to compare the mechanical stability of two methods of fixation for arthrodesis of the hallux metatarsophalangeal joint: 1. a technique using an intramedullary screw and 2. a standard technique using crossed interfragmentary compression screws. METHODOLOGY: The metatarsophalangeal joint was mechanically evaluated in cantilever bending using a servohydraulic testing machine. Differences in stiffness and strength parameters between the two techniques were checked for significance (P<0.05) using a paired t-test. RESULTS: Fixation provided by the intramedullary screw was stiffer and stronger than that from crossed compression screws. CONCLUSIONS: The stronger and stiffer intramedullary screw technique offers mechanical advantages over the crossed interfragmentary screw technique.
PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to compare the mechanical stability of two methods of fixation for arthrodesis of the hallux metatarsophalangeal joint: 1. a technique using an intramedullary screw and 2. a standard technique using crossed interfragmentary compression screws. METHODOLOGY: The metatarsophalangeal joint was mechanically evaluated in cantilever bending using a servohydraulic testing machine. Differences in stiffness and strength parameters between the two techniques were checked for significance (P<0.05) using a paired t-test. RESULTS: Fixation provided by the intramedullary screw was stiffer and stronger than that from crossed compression screws. CONCLUSIONS: The stronger and stiffer intramedullary screw technique offers mechanical advantages over the crossed interfragmentary screw technique.