Literature DB >> 12627514

Tumor mitotic rate is a more powerful prognostic indicator than ulceration in patients with primary cutaneous melanoma: an analysis of 3661 patients from a single center.

Manuela F Azzola1, Helen M Shaw, John F Thompson, Seng-Jaw Soong, Richard A Scolyer, Geoffrey F Watson, Marjorie H Colman, Yuting Zhang.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The current study was performed to determine whether tumor mitotic rate (TMR) is a useful, independent prognostic factor in patients with localized cutaneous melanoma.
METHODS: From the Sydney Melanoma Unit database, 3661 patients with complete clinical information and details of primary tumor thickness, ulcerative state, and TMR were studied. TMR was expressed as mitoses per mm(2) in the dermal part of the tumor in which most mitoses were seen, as recommended in the 1982 revision of the 1972 Sydney classification of malignant melanoma. To determine which was the more prognostically useful method of grouping TMR, two separate methods (A and B) were used. Factors predicting melanoma-specific survival were analyzed using the Cox proportional hazards regression model.
RESULTS: Patients with a TMR of 0 mitoses/mm(2) had a significantly better survival than those with 1 mitosis/mm(2) (P < 0.0001) but no significant survival differences were recorded for the stepwise increases from 1-2, 2-3, 3-4, and 4-5/mm(2). Tumor thickness, ulceration, and TMR were closely correlated, whether TMR was grouped using Method A (0, 1-4, 5-10, and >/= 11 mitoses/mm(2)) or Method B (0-1, 2-4, and >/= 5 mitoses/mm(2)). However, Cox regression analysis indicated that the TMR was a highly significant independent prognostic factor, particularly when grouped according to Method A, in which it was second only to tumor thickness as the most powerful predictor of survival (P < 0.0001).
CONCLUSIONS: TMR is an important independent predictor of survival for melanoma patients. If confirmed by studies from other centers, it has the potential to further improve the accuracy of melanoma staging, as well as to define more rigidly the risk categories for patients entering clinical trials. Copyright 2003 American Cancer Society.DOI 10.1002/cncr.11196

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12627514     DOI: 10.1002/cncr.11196

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  58 in total

1.  Prognostic significance of mitotic rate in localized primary cutaneous melanoma: an analysis of patients in the multi-institutional American Joint Committee on Cancer melanoma staging database.

Authors:  John F Thompson; Seng-Jaw Soong; Charles M Balch; Jeffrey E Gershenwald; Shouluan Ding; Daniel G Coit; Keith T Flaherty; Phyllis A Gimotty; Timothy Johnson; Marcella M Johnson; Stanley P Leong; Merrick I Ross; David R Byrd; Natale Cascinelli; Alistair J Cochran; Alexander M Eggermont; Kelly M McMasters; Martin C Mihm; Donald L Morton; Vernon K Sondak
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-04-25       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 2.  A brief history of melanoma: from mummies to mutations.

Authors:  Vito W Rebecca; Vernon K Sondak; Keiran S M Smalley
Journal:  Melanoma Res       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 3.599

Review 3.  Chinese Guidelines on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Melanoma (2015 Edition).

Authors:  Jun Guo; Shukui Qin; Jun Liang; Tongyu Lin; Lu Si; Xiaohong Chen; Zhihong Chi; Chuanliang Cui; Nan Du; Yun Fan; Kangsheng Gu; Fang Li; Junling Li; Yongheng Li; Houjie Liang; Jiwei Liu; Man Lu; Aiping Lu; Kejun Nan; Xiaohui Niu; Hongming Pan; Guoxin Ren; Xiubao Ren; Yongqian Shu; Xin Song; Min Tao; Baocheng Wang; Wenbin Wei; Di Wu; Lingying Wu; Aiwen Wu; Xiaolin Xu; Junyi Zhang; Xiaoshi Zhang; Yiping Zhang; Huiyan Zhu
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2015-12

4.  Antineoplastic effects of Rhodiola crenulata treatment on B16-F10 melanoma.

Authors:  Maxine C Dudek; Kaitlyn E Wong; Lotfi M Bassa; Maria Carmen Mora; Jennifer Ser-Dolansky; Jean M Henneberry; Giovanna M Crisi; Richard B Arenas; Sallie S Schneider
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2015-07-10

5.  Analysis of tumor mitotic rate in thin metastatic melanomas compared with thin melanomas without metastasis using both the hematoxylin and eosin and anti-phosphohistone 3 IHC stain.

Authors:  Sumeet Thareja; Jonathan S Zager; Divya Sadhwani; Shalini Thareja; Ren Chen; Suroosh Marzban; Drazen M Jukic; Lewis F Glass; Jane Messina
Journal:  Am J Dermatopathol       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 1.533

Review 6.  Evolving concepts in melanoma classification and their relevance to multidisciplinary melanoma patient care.

Authors:  Richard A Scolyer; Georgina V Long; John F Thompson
Journal:  Mol Oncol       Date:  2011-03-21       Impact factor: 6.603

7.  Activation of the extracellular signal regulated kinase (ERK) pathway in human melanoma.

Authors:  L Zhuang; C S Lee; R A Scolyer; S W McCarthy; A A Palmer; X D Zhang; J F Thompson; L P Bron; P Hersey
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 3.411

8.  Clinicopathological Features, Staging, and Current Approaches to Treatment in High-Risk Resectable Melanoma.

Authors:  Emily Z Keung; Jeffrey E Gershenwald
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2020-09-01       Impact factor: 13.506

9.  Ki-67 expression is superior to mitotic count and novel proliferation markers PHH3, MCM4 and mitosin as a prognostic factor in thick cutaneous melanoma.

Authors:  Rita G Ladstein; Ingeborg M Bachmann; Oddbjørn Straume; Lars A Akslen
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2010-04-14       Impact factor: 4.430

10.  Histopathology report of cutaneous melanoma and sentinel lymph node in Europe: a web-based survey by the Dermatopathology Working Group of the European Society of Pathology.

Authors:  Anna Batistatou; Martin G Cook; Daniela Massi
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2009-04-08       Impact factor: 4.064

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.