Literature DB >> 12627304

Neuromuscular adaptations during concurrent strength and endurance training versus strength training.

K Häkkinen1, M Alen, W J Kraemer, E Gorostiaga, M Izquierdo, H Rusko, J Mikkola, A Häkkinen, H Valkeinen, E Kaarakainen, S Romu, V Erola, J Ahtiainen, L Paavolainen.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate effects of concurrent strength and endurance training (SE) (2 plus 2 days a week) versus strength training only (S) (2 days a week) in men [SE: n=11; 38 (5) years, S: n=16; 37 (5) years] over a training period of 21 weeks. The resistance training program addressed both maximal and explosive strength components. EMG, maximal isometric force, 1 RM strength, and rate of force development (RFD) of the leg extensors, muscle cross-sectional area (CSA) of the quadriceps femoris (QF) throughout the lengths of 4/15-12/15 (L(f)) of the femur, muscle fibre proportion and areas of types I, IIa, and IIb of the vastus lateralis (VL), and maximal oxygen uptake (VO(2max)) were evaluated. No changes occurred in strength during the 1-week control period, while after the 21-week training period increases of 21% (p<0.001) and 22% (p<0.001), and of 22% (p<0.001) and 21% (p<0.001) took place in the 1RM load and maximal isometric force in S and SE, respectively. Increases of 26% (p<0.05) and 29% (p<0.001) occurred in the maximum iEMG of the VL in S and SE, respectively. The CSA of the QF increased throughout the length of the QF (from 4/15 to 12/15 L(f)) both in S (p<0.05-0.001) and SE (p<0.01-0.001). The mean fibre areas of types I, IIa and IIb increased after the training both in S (p<0.05 and 0.01) and SE (p<0.05 and p<0.01). S showed an increase in RFD (p<0.01), while no change occurred in SE. The average iEMG of the VL during the first 500 ms of the rapid isometric action increased (p<0.05-0.001) only in S. VO(2max) increased by 18.5% (p<0.001) in SE. The present data do not support the concept of the universal nature of the interference effect in strength development and muscle hypertrophy when strength training is performed concurrently with endurance training, and the training volume is diluted by a longer period of time with a low frequency of training. However, the present results suggest that even the low-frequency concurrent strength and endurance training leads to interference in explosive strength development mediated in part by the limitations of rapid voluntary neural activation of the trained muscles.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12627304     DOI: 10.1007/s00421-002-0751-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol        ISSN: 1439-6319            Impact factor:   3.078


  27 in total

1.  Selective muscle hypertrophy, changes in EMG and force, and serum hormones during strength training in older women.

Authors:  K Häkkinen; A Pakarinen; W J Kraemer; A Häkkinen; H Valkeinen; M Alen
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2001-08

2.  Effects of simultaneous training for strength and endurance on upper and lower body strength and running performance.

Authors:  T Hortobágyi; F I Katch; P F Lachance
Journal:  J Sports Med Phys Fitness       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 1.637

3.  Interaction between concurrent strength and endurance training.

Authors:  D G Sale; J D MacDougall; I Jacobs; S Garner
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  1990-01

4.  Training of muscle strength and power: interaction of neuromotoric, hypertrophic, and mechanical factors.

Authors:  P V Komi
Journal:  Int J Sports Med       Date:  1986-06       Impact factor: 3.118

5.  Three "myosin adenosine triphosphatase" systems: the nature of their pH lability and sulfhydryl dependence.

Authors:  M H Brooke; K K Kaiser
Journal:  J Histochem Cytochem       Date:  1970-09       Impact factor: 2.479

Review 6.  Adaptations of skeletal muscle to endurance exercise and their metabolic consequences.

Authors:  J O Holloszy; E F Coyle
Journal:  J Appl Physiol Respir Environ Exerc Physiol       Date:  1984-04

7.  Reproducibility of aerobic and anaerobic thresholds in 20-50 year old men.

Authors:  S Aunola; H Rusko
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol       Date:  1984

8.  Incompatibility of endurance- and strength-training modes of exercise.

Authors:  G A Dudley; R Djamil
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  1985-11

9.  Potential for gross muscle hypertrophy in older men.

Authors:  T Moritani; H A deVries
Journal:  J Gerontol       Date:  1980-09

10.  Neural factors versus hypertrophy in the time course of muscle strength gain.

Authors:  T Moritani; H A deVries
Journal:  Am J Phys Med       Date:  1979-06
View more
  88 in total

1.  Are training velocity and movement pattern important determinants of muscular rate of force development enhancement?

Authors:  Anthony Blazevich
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2012-02-15       Impact factor: 3.078

2.  Neuromuscular adaptations to concurrent training in the elderly: effects of intrasession exercise sequence.

Authors:  Eduardo Lusa Cadore; Mikel Izquierdo; Stephanie Santana Pinto; Cristine Lima Alberton; Ronei Silveira Pinto; Bruno Manfredini Baroni; Marco Aurélio Vaz; Fábio Juner Lanferdini; Régis Radaelli; Miriam González-Izal; Martim Bottaro; Luiz Fernando Martins Kruel
Journal:  Age (Dordr)       Date:  2012-03-28

3.  ACL Research Retreat V: an update on ACL injury risk and prevention, March 25-27, 2010, Greensboro, NC.

Authors:  Sandra J Shultz; Randy J Schmitz; Anh-Dung Nguyen; Ajit M Chaudhari; Darin A Padua; Scott G McLean; Susan M Sigward
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2010 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.860

4.  Electromyographic signal and force comparisons during maximal voluntary isometric contraction in water and on dry land.

Authors:  Stephanie Santana Pinto; Giane Veiga Liedtke; Cristine Lima Alberton; Eduardo Marczwski da Silva; Eduardo Lusa Cadore; Luiz Fernando Martins Kruel
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2010-08-10       Impact factor: 3.078

5.  Combined resistance and endurance training improves physical capacity and performance on tactical occupational tasks.

Authors:  Nathan R Hendrickson; Marilyn A Sharp; Joseph A Alemany; Leila A Walker; Everett A Harman; Barry A Spiering; Disa L Hatfield; Linda M Yamamoto; Carl M Maresh; William J Kraemer; Bradley C Nindl
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2010-04-10       Impact factor: 3.078

6.  Neuromuscular adaptations to water-based concurrent training in postmenopausal women: effects of intrasession exercise sequence.

Authors:  Stephanie S Pinto; Cristine L Alberton; Natália C Bagatini; Paula Zaffari; Eduardo L Cadore; Régis Radaelli; Bruno M Baroni; Fábio J Lanferdini; Rodrigo Ferrari; Ana Carolina Kanitz; Ronei S Pinto; Marco Aurélio Vaz; Luiz Fernando M Kruel
Journal:  Age (Dordr)       Date:  2015-02-03

7.  Effects of combined resistance and cardiovascular training on strength, power, muscle cross-sectional area, and endurance markers in middle-aged men.

Authors:  Mikel Izquierdo; Keijo Häkkinen; Javier Ibáñez; William J Kraemer; Esteban M Gorostiaga
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2004-12-23       Impact factor: 3.078

Review 8.  Power athletes and distance training: physiological and biomechanical rationale for change.

Authors:  Marcus C C W Elliott; Phillip P Wagner; Loren Chiu
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 11.136

Review 9.  The influence of frequency, intensity, volume and mode of strength training on whole muscle cross-sectional area in humans.

Authors:  Mathias Wernbom; Jesper Augustsson; Roland Thomeé
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 11.136

10.  Changes in power and force generation during coupled eccentric-concentric versus concentric muscle contraction with training and aging.

Authors:  Paolo Caserotti; Per Aagaard; Lis Puggaard
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2008-01-23       Impact factor: 3.078

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.