Literature DB >> 12627209

Avoidance and management of positive surgical margins before, during and after radical prostatectomy.

S R J Bott1, R S Kirby.   

Abstract

Positive surgical margins after radical prostatectomy lead to an increased risk of progression and reduced disease free survival. Earlier detection of prostate cancer, appropriate patient selection and improved operative techniques can reduce the incidence of positive margins, though the risk can not be eliminated as pre-operative staging techniques are not sufficiently sensitive. Nerve sparing and bladder neck sparing do not adversely affect margin status in appropriately selected men. Once positive margins have been diagnosed the optimal management and the timing of treatment remains controversial. Adjuvant radiotherapy or salvage radiotherapy in men with a low PSA may improve local control and PSA free survival in some individuals, a survival benefit has not yet been established.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12627209     DOI: 10.1038/sj.pcan.4500612

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis        ISSN: 1365-7852            Impact factor:   5.554


  6 in total

1.  Preclinical Validation of the Utility of BLZ-100 in Providing Fluorescence Contrast for Imaging Spontaneous Solid Tumors.

Authors:  Janean Fidel; Katie C Kennedy; William S Dernell; Stacey Hansen; Valorie Wiss; Mark R Stroud; Joshua I Molho; Sue E Knoblaugh; Jeffrey Meganck; James M Olson; Brad Rice; Julia Parrish-Novak
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2015-10-15       Impact factor: 12.701

2.  Influence of pathologist experience on positive surgical margins following radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Jacob E Tallman; Vignesh T Packiam; Kristen E Wroblewski; Gladell P Paner; Scott E Eggener
Journal:  Urol Oncol       Date:  2017-03-13       Impact factor: 3.498

3.  Survival in prostate cancer patients > or = 70 years after radical prostatectomy and comparison to younger patients.

Authors:  Jesco Pfitzenmaier; Sascha Pahernik; Stephan Buse; Axel Haferkamp; Nenad Djakovic; Markus Hohenfellner
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2009-04-26       Impact factor: 4.226

4.  Contemporary update of cancer control after radical prostatectomy in the UK.

Authors:  M H Winkler; F A Khan; M Shabir; A Okeke; M Sugiono; P McInerney; G B Boustead; R Persad; A V Kaisary; D A Gillatt
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2004-11-29       Impact factor: 7.640

5.  The optimal timing of post-prostate biopsy magnetic resonance imaging to guide nerve-sparing surgery.

Authors:  Young Hwii Ko; Phil Hyun Song; Ki Hak Moon; Hee Chang Jung; Jun Cheon; Deuk Jae Sung
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2014 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.285

6.  The use of early postoperative prostate-specific antigen to stratify risk in patients with positive surgical margins after radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Stepan Vesely; Ladislav Jarolim; Katerina Duskova; Marek Schmidt; Pavel Dusek; Marko Babjuk
Journal:  BMC Urol       Date:  2014-10-02       Impact factor: 2.264

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.