Literature DB >> 12626472

Respiratory effects of the scalene and sternomastoid muscles in humans.

Alexandre Legrand1, Emmanuelle Schneider, Pierre-Alain Gevenois, Andre De Troyer.   

Abstract

Previous studies have shown that in normal humans the change in airway opening pressure (DeltaPao) produced by all the parasternal and external intercostal muscles during a maximal contraction is approximately -18 cmH(2)O. This value is substantially less negative than DeltaPao values recorded during maximal static inspiratory efforts in subjects with complete diaphragmatic paralysis. In the present study, therefore, the respiratory effects of the two prominent inspiratory muscles of the neck, the sternomastoids and the scalenes, were evaluated by application of the Maxwell reciprocity theorem. Seven healthy subjects were placed in a computed tomographic scanner to determine the fractional changes in muscle length during inflation from functional residual capacity to total lung capacity and the masses of the muscles. Inflation induced greater shortening of the scalenes than the sternomastoids in every subject. The inspiratory mechanical advantage of the scalenes thus averaged (mean +/- SE) 3.4 +/- 0.4%/l, whereas that of the sternomastoids was 2.0 +/- 0.3%/l (P < 0.001). However, sternomastoid muscle mass was much larger than scalene muscle mass. As a result, DeltaPao generated by a maximal contraction of either muscle would be 3-4 cmH(2)O, which is about the same as DeltaPao generated by the parasternal intercostals in all interspaces.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12626472     DOI: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00869.2002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)        ISSN: 0161-7567


  17 in total

Review 1.  The output from human inspiratory motoneurone pools.

Authors:  Jane E Butler; Simon C Gandevia
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2007-11-01       Impact factor: 5.182

2.  Diaphragm muscle function following midcervical contusion injury in rats.

Authors:  Obaid U Khurram; Matthew J Fogarty; Sabhya Rana; Pangdra Vang; Gary C Sieck; Carlos B Mantilla
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2018-09-20

3.  Neck inspiratory muscle activation patterns during well-controlled inspiration.

Authors:  Sohei Washino; Hiroaki Kanehisa; Yasuhide Yoshitake
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2017-08-19       Impact factor: 3.078

4.  Coordination of respiratory muscles assessed by means of nonlinear forecasting of demodulated myographic signals.

Authors:  Joan F Alonso; Miguel A Mañanas; Mónica Rojas; Eugene N Bruce
Journal:  J Electromyogr Kinesiol       Date:  2011-08-06       Impact factor: 2.368

Review 5.  Muscle dysfunction in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: update on causes and biological findings.

Authors:  Joaquim Gea; Sergi Pascual; Carme Casadevall; Mauricio Orozco-Levi; Esther Barreiro
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 2.895

6.  Effect of acute hypoxia on inspiratory muscle oxygenation during incremental inspiratory loading in healthy adults.

Authors:  Nada Basoudan; Babak Shadgan; Jordan A Guenette; Jeremy Road; W Darlene Reid
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2016-02-18       Impact factor: 3.078

7.  Compensatory effects following unilateral diaphragm paralysis.

Authors:  Obaid U Khurram; Gary C Sieck; Carlos B Mantilla
Journal:  Respir Physiol Neurobiol       Date:  2017-08-05       Impact factor: 1.931

8.  Neuromechanical matching of drive in the scalene muscle of the anesthetized rabbit.

Authors:  Alexandre Legrand; Melanie Majcher; Emma Joly; Adeline Bonaert; Pierre Alain Gevenois
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2009-07-16

9.  Characteristics of tetanic force produced by the sternomastoid muscle of the rat.

Authors:  Stanislaw Sobotka; Liancai Mu
Journal:  J Biomed Biotechnol       Date:  2010-05-25

10.  The effect of lung volume on the co-ordinated recruitment of scalene and sternomastoid muscles in humans.

Authors:  Anna L Hudson; Simon C Gandevia; Jane E Butler
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2007-08-09       Impact factor: 5.182

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.