OBJECTIVES: To investigate the association between clinical team functioning and diffusion (awareness, use, and impact) of a 24-hour online evidence retrieval system. To examine the relationships between clinical team characteristics and the adoption of the online evidence system. DESIGN: 18 clinical teams, consisting of 180 clinicians from three Australian hospitals, were identified and studied. Teams were categorized as small (<or= 15 members) or large (> 15). MEASUREMENTS: Clinical team functioning was assessed using the Team Climate Inventory (TCI). Awareness, use, and impact of an online evidence retrieval system were measured using a self-administered questionnaire. The relationships between TCI scores and awareness, use, and impact were examined using t-tests and one-way ANOVAs. Chi square analyses were used to examine differences between small and large teams. RESULTS were interpreted within a diffusion of innovations framework. RESULTS: Clinical team functioning was not related to awareness or use of the online evidence retrieval system. However, clinical team functioning was significantly associated with the impact of online evidence in terms of reported experience of improved patient care following system use. Clinicians in small teams (<or= 15 members) had higher levels of system awareness compared to large (> 15) teams. CONCLUSIONS: Team functioning had the greatest impact on the fourth stage of innovation diffusion, the effective use of online evidence for clinical care. This supports Rogers' diffusion of innovation theory, to the effect that different types of communication about an innovation are important at different stages in the diffusion process. Members of small teams were more aware of the system than members of large teams. Team functioning is amenable to improvement through interventions. The findings suggest that the role of team climate in the diffusion of information systems is a promising area for future research.
OBJECTIVES: To investigate the association between clinical team functioning and diffusion (awareness, use, and impact) of a 24-hour online evidence retrieval system. To examine the relationships between clinical team characteristics and the adoption of the online evidence system. DESIGN: 18 clinical teams, consisting of 180 clinicians from three Australian hospitals, were identified and studied. Teams were categorized as small (<or= 15 members) or large (> 15). MEASUREMENTS: Clinical team functioning was assessed using the Team Climate Inventory (TCI). Awareness, use, and impact of an online evidence retrieval system were measured using a self-administered questionnaire. The relationships between TCI scores and awareness, use, and impact were examined using t-tests and one-way ANOVAs. Chi square analyses were used to examine differences between small and large teams. RESULTS were interpreted within a diffusion of innovations framework. RESULTS: Clinical team functioning was not related to awareness or use of the online evidence retrieval system. However, clinical team functioning was significantly associated with the impact of online evidence in terms of reported experience of improved patient care following system use. Clinicians in small teams (<or= 15 members) had higher levels of system awareness compared to large (> 15) teams. CONCLUSIONS: Team functioning had the greatest impact on the fourth stage of innovation diffusion, the effective use of online evidence for clinical care. This supports Rogers' diffusion of innovation theory, to the effect that different types of communication about an innovation are important at different stages in the diffusion process. Members of small teams were more aware of the system than members of large teams. Team functioning is amenable to improvement through interventions. The findings suggest that the role of team climate in the diffusion of information systems is a promising area for future research.
Authors: Marie-Dominique Beaulieu; Nataliya Dragieva; Claudio Del Grande; Jeremy Dawson; Jeannie L Haggerty; Jan Barnsley; William E Hogg; Pierre Tousignant; Michael A West Journal: Healthc Policy Date: 2014-02
Authors: Rachel D A Havyer; Majken T Wingo; Nneka I Comfere; Darlene R Nelson; Andrew J Halvorsen; Furman S McDonald; Darcy A Reed Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2013-12-11 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Johanna I Westbrook; Jeffrey Braithwaite; Kathryn Gibson; Richard Paoloni; Joanne Callen; Andrew Georgiou; Nerida Creswick; Louise Robertson Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2009-11-08 Impact factor: 2.655
Authors: Danielle M Lottridge; Mark Chignell; Romana Danicic-Mizdrak; Nada J Pavlovic; Andre Kushniruk; Sharon E Straus Journal: BMC Med Inform Decis Mak Date: 2007-07-26 Impact factor: 2.796
Authors: Majken T Wingo; Rachel D A Havyer; Nneka I Comfere; Darlene R Nelson; Darcy A Reed Journal: BMC Med Educ Date: 2015-09-14 Impact factor: 2.463