Literature DB >> 12626324

Interaction of glucagon and epinephrine in the control of hepatic glucose production in the conscious dog.

Stephanie M Gustavson1, Chang An Chu, Makoto Nishizawa, Ben Farmer, Doss Neal, Ying Yang, E Patrick Donahue, Paul Flakoll, Alan D Cherrington.   

Abstract

Epinephrine increases net hepatic glucose output (NHGO) mainly via increased gluconeogenesis, whereas glucagon increases NHGO mainly via increased glycogenolysis. The aim of the present study was to determine how the two hormones interact in controlling glucose production. In 18-h-fasted conscious dogs, a pancreatic clamp initially fixed insulin and glucagon at basal levels, following which one of four protocols was instituted. In G + E, glucagon (1.5 ng x kg(-1) x min(-1); portally) and epinephrine (50 ng x kg(-1) x min(-1); peripherally) were increased; in G, glucagon was increased alone; in E, epinephrine was increased alone; and in C, neither was increased. In G, E, and C, glucose was infused to match the hyperglycemia seen in G + E ( approximately 250 mg/dl). The areas under the curve for the increase in NHGO, after the change in C was subtracted, were as follows: G = 661 +/- 185, E = 424 +/- 158, G + E = 1178 +/- 57 mg/kg. Therefore, the overall effects of the two hormones on NHGO were additive. Additionally, glucagon exerted its full glycogenolytic effect, whereas epinephrine exerted its full gluconeogenic effect, such that both processes increased significantly during concurrent hormone administration.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12626324     DOI: 10.1152/ajpendo.00308.2002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab        ISSN: 0193-1849            Impact factor:   4.310


  8 in total

1.  Alcohol Intoxication and the Postburn Gastrointestinal Hormonal Response.

Authors:  Juan-Pablo Idrovo; Jill A Shults; Brenda J Curtis; Michael M Chen; Elizabeth J Kovacs
Journal:  J Burn Care Res       Date:  2019-10-16       Impact factor: 1.845

Review 2.  What, how, and how much should patients with burns be fed?

Authors:  Felicia N Williams; Ludwik K Branski; Marc G Jeschke; David N Herndon
Journal:  Surg Clin North Am       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 2.741

3.  Glucose metabolism during the early "flow phase" after burn injury.

Authors:  Hongzhi Xu; Yong-Ming Yu; Harry Ma; Edward A Carter; Shawn Fagan; Ronald G Tompkins; Alan J Fischman
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  2012-03-10       Impact factor: 2.192

4.  Insulin-induced hypoglycemia increases hepatic sensitivity to glucagon in dogs.

Authors:  Noelia Rivera; Christopher J Ramnanan; Zhibo An; Tiffany Farmer; Marta Smith; Ben Farmer; Jose M Irimia; Wanda Snead; Margaret Lautz; Peter J Roach; Alan D Cherrington
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2010-11-15       Impact factor: 14.808

Review 5.  Insulin resistance postburn: underlying mechanisms and current therapeutic strategies.

Authors:  Gerd G Gauglitz; David N Herndon; Marc G Jeschke
Journal:  J Burn Care Res       Date:  2008 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.845

6.  Effects of 11β-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase-1 inhibition on hepatic glycogenolysis and gluconeogenesis.

Authors:  J J Winnick; C J Ramnanan; V Saraswathi; J Roop; M Scott; P Jacobson; P Jung; R Basu; A D Cherrington; D S Edgerton
Journal:  Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2013-02-12       Impact factor: 4.310

Review 7.  Pro/con debate: Is intensive insulin therapy targeting tight blood glucose control of benefit in critically ill patients?

Authors:  Tobias M Merz; Simon Finfer
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2008-04-25       Impact factor: 9.097

8.  Pancreatic function and histoarchitecture in Wistar rats following chronic exposure to Bushfire®: the mitigating role of zinc.

Authors:  Emmanuel Tizhe; Najume Ibrahim; Mohammed Fatihu; Suleiman Ambali; Ikechukwu Igbokwe; Ussa Tizhe
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2018-07-01       Impact factor: 1.671

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.