Literature DB >> 12625863

Modified microplex vector enhances transfection of cells in culture while maintaining tumour-selective gene delivery in-vivo.

Crispin R Dass1, Mark A Burton.   

Abstract

A non-commercial liposome (dimethyl dioctadecyl ammonium bromide:dioleoyl phosphatidylethanolamine) was compared with a commercial variety (Lipofectamine) for transfection of cultured rat adenocarcinoma cells and in an in-vivo kidney tumour model. Transfection of the cells in culture and in tumours in-vivo was variable with both types of liposomes. A high-dose microplex (lipoplex-microsphere) vector enhanced liposome-mediated transfection of cells in culture. When these high-dose microplexes were tested in-vivo, they were better than both microspherical and liposomal delivery modes in terms of transgene expression levels and the tumour-to-normal tissue ratio of gene delivery. Microplexes have been demonstrated to be capable of not only selective delivery of plasmids to solid tumours, but also of increasing transfection in cell culture, a finding that may be used in ex-vivo transfection studies. It is hypothesized that microspheres anchored the combination vector closer to the cultured cells, allowing attached liposomes to gain easier access into cells. In-vivo, microspheres permitted the microplexes to selectively deliver their genetic payload within the tumour tissue, from where the action of cationic liposomes on cellular membranes facilitated increased access of plasmids into the cytosol of target cells.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12625863     DOI: 10.1111/j.2042-7158.2003.tb02429.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pharm Pharmacol        ISSN: 0022-3573            Impact factor:   3.765


  5 in total

Review 1.  Lipoplex-mediated delivery of nucleic acids: factors affecting in vivo transfection.

Authors:  Crispin R Dass
Journal:  J Mol Med (Berl)       Date:  2004-06-23       Impact factor: 4.599

2.  Targeting of small molecule anticancer drugs to the tumour and its vasculature using cationic liposomes: lessons from gene therapy.

Authors:  Crispin R Dass; Peter F M Choong
Journal:  Cancer Cell Int       Date:  2006-06-23       Impact factor: 5.722

Review 3.  Barriers to Liposomal Gene Delivery: from Application Site to the Target.

Authors:  Mostafa Saffari; Hamid Reza Moghimi; Crispin R Dass
Journal:  Iran J Pharm Res       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 1.696

4.  Comparison of partially and fully chemically-modified siRNA in conjugate-mediated delivery in vivo.

Authors:  Matthew R Hassler; Anton A Turanov; Julia F Alterman; Reka A Haraszti; Andrew H Coles; Maire F Osborn; Dimas Echeverria; Mehran Nikan; William E Salomon; Loïc Roux; Bruno M D C Godinho; Sarah M Davis; David V Morrissey; Phillip D Zamore; S Ananth Karumanchi; Melissa J Moore; Neil Aronin; Anastasia Khvorova
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2018-03-16       Impact factor: 16.971

Review 5.  Nanoparticulate systems for polynucleotide delivery.

Authors:  Ashwin Basarkar; Jagdish Singh
Journal:  Int J Nanomedicine       Date:  2007
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.