Literature DB >> 12625600

Systolic, diastolic, and pulse pressures as coronary risk factors in a population with low cholesterol levels: a prospective 10-year evaluation.

Altan Onat1, Köksal Ceyhan, Burak Erer, Omer Başar, Omer Uysal, Vedat Sansoy.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Pulse pressure (PP) has recently been found to be predictive of subsequent cardiovascular, particularly coronary, events in some middle-aged and elderly populations. HYPOTHESIS: The aim of this prospective population-based study was to evaluate the roles of systolic (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), and PP in predicting coronary heart disease (CHD) morbidity and mortality in both genders in a population of a wide age span and a setting of low levels of low-density lipoprotein (LDL) and high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol.
METHODS: Of participants in the Turkish Adult Risk Factor Study aged > or = 20 years, those free of CHD at baseline examination in 1990 were followed up for a mean of 9.3 years. Coronary heart disease was diagnosed based on clinical findings and Minnesota coding of resting electrocardiograms (ECGs). In 2,601 men and women (mean age at baseline 41.4 +/- 15 years), deaths from CHD developed in 80 and nonfatal CHD in 158 patients.
RESULTS: In a logistic regression analysis for predictors of composite endpoint of coronary mortality and morbidity, individually. DBP was not significantly and independently associated, while SBP was an independent risk predictor in both genders (relative risk [RR] 1.016). When two of three blood pressure components were entered jointly into the multivariable model, PP had a value inferior to that of SBP among men and women, but was of greater value than DBP in men in predicting both the composite endpoint and death from CHD. Among women, the predictive values of PP and DBP were similar. Within the categories of SBP > or = 120 mmHg in men, PP contributed significantly to the predictive power of SBP in overall CHD risk over and above that supplied by SBP, whereas DBP remained noncontributory.
CONCLUSION: Although inferior to the predictive power of SBP, PP was an important determinant of CHD risk in a population of a diverse age span and a better predictor than DBP in men.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12625600      PMCID: PMC6654633          DOI: 10.1002/clc.4960260209

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Cardiol        ISSN: 0160-9289            Impact factor:   2.882


  7 in total

Review 1.  Risks and diagnosis of coronary artery disease in Hodgkin lymphoma survivors.

Authors:  Serhan Kupeli
Journal:  World J Cardiol       Date:  2014-07-26

2.  Hyperuricemia and its related factors in an urban population, Izmir, Turkey.

Authors:  Ismail Sari; Servet Akar; Betul Pakoz; Ali Riza Sisman; Oguz Gurler; Merih Birlik; Fatos Onen; Nurullah Akkoc
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  2008-12-02       Impact factor: 2.631

3.  Attempted forced titration of blood pressure to <130/85 mm Hg in type 2 diabetic hypertensive patients in clinical practice: the diastolic cost.

Authors:  Esther Osher; Yona Greenman; Karen Tordjman; Eldad Kisch; Galina Shenkerman; Michael Koffler; Itzhak Shapira; Naftali Stern
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 3.738

4.  Prevalence of metabolic syndrome-related disorders in a large adult population in Turkey.

Authors:  S Yavuz Sanisoglu; Cagatay Oktenli; Adnan Hasimi; Mehmet Yokusoglu; Mehmet Ugurlu
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2006-04-10       Impact factor: 3.295

5.  Effectiveness of multidisciplinary intervention on blood pressure control in primary health care: a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Regina Kuhmmer; Rosmeri Kuhmmer Lazzaretti; Cátia Moreira Guterres; Fabiana Viegas Raimundo; Leni Everson Araújo Leite; Tássia Scholante Delabary; Suhelen Caon; Gisele Alsina Nader Bastos; Carisi Anne Polanczyk
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2016-08-31       Impact factor: 2.655

Review 6.  A comparison of blood pressure in community pharmacies with ambulatory, home and general practitioner office readings: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ali Albasri; Jack W OʼSullivan; Nia W Roberts; Suman Prinjha; Richard J McManus; James P Sheppard
Journal:  J Hypertens       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 4.844

7.  Central rather than brachial pressures are stronger predictors of cardiovascular outcomes: A longitudinal prospective study in a Chinese population.

Authors:  Ying Dong; Linlin Jiang; Xin Wang; Zuo Chen; Linfeng Zhang; Zugui Zhang; Congyi Zheng; Yuting Kang; Zengwu Wang; Huiqing Cao; Xiaoxia Wang; Tian Fang; Xiaoyan Han; Zhe Li; Ye Tian; Lihang Dong; Fengyu Sun; Fucai Yuan; Xin Zhou; Yunyang Zhu; Yi He; Qingping Xi; Ruihai Yang; Jun Yang; Yong Ren; Maiqi Dan; Yiyue Wang; Daming Yu; Ru Ju; Dongshuang Guo; Dahua Tan; Zhiguo Zheng; Jingjing Zheng; Yang Xu; Dongsheng Wang; Tao Chen; Meihui Su; Yongde Zhang; Zhanhang Sun; Chen Dai
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2020-03-09       Impact factor: 3.738

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.