Literature DB >> 12625229

A triangulation approach to historical exposure assessment for the carbon black industry.

Philip Harber1, Henry Muranko, Stephen Shvartsblat, Sophia Solis, Ani Torossian, Tilly Oren.   

Abstract

The determination of cumulative exposures for individual workers is necessary for research and practice of occupational health and hygiene. Reconstruction of exposures for a study of respiratory morbidity was needed to study the effects of exposure to carbon black production. Approximately 15,800 exposure estimates were needed. There were 22 plants, a 40-year time span, six job categories, and three types of dust-exposure metrics (respirable, inhalable, and "total" dust). Three information sources were used: 1) Industrial hygiene air level measurements where available (several industry-wide surveys had been conducted). 2) A formal process survey identifying specific dates and types of process and control changes. 3) An Historical Relative Exposure Rating Scale; plant health and safety personnel used this spreadsheet-based rating scheme to quantify exposures before and between years of actual measurement relative to a reference year in which measurements were available. A job-exposure matrix was calculated by integrating these three methods. Linear scaling factors were identified to interconvert geometric to arithmetic means and to interconvert total and inhalable dust. Individual worker cumulative exposures were then calculated based upon job histories linked with the job-exposure matrix. The nine-step process for integrating all available relevant data was effective in estimating the exposures for each of the cells of the job-exposure matrix. Among the 1680 workers participating, the mean cumulative inhalable dust exposure was 48.4 mg-years/m3. Early years contribute disproportionately to the cumulative exposures of individuals since levels have declined significantly over time. The use of multiple sources of information, including a relative exposure rating instrument, significantly facilitates reconstruction of historical exposures. Inadequate adjustment for temporal trends can lead to underestimation of cumulative exposures and significantly affect estimation of dose-effect relationships. These methods are applicable to other situations requiring estimation of cumulative exposure with sparse industrial hygiene data in early years.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12625229     DOI: 10.1097/01.jom.0000052956.59271.bd

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Occup Environ Med        ISSN: 1076-2752            Impact factor:   2.162


  4 in total

1.  Causal Inference Analysis for Poorly Soluble Low Toxicity Particles, Lung Function, and Malignancy.

Authors:  Philip Harber
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2022-07-05

2.  Extended Investigation of Exposure to Respirable Synthetic Amorphous Silica Dust and Its Potential Impact on Non-malignant Respiratory Morbidity.

Authors:  Mei Yong; Peter Morfeld; Robert McCunney
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2022-05-12

3.  Musculoskeletal symptoms associated with workplace physical exposures estimated by a job exposure matrix and by self-report.

Authors:  Marcus Yung; Ann Marie Dale; Skye Buckner-Petty; Yves Roquelaure; Alexis Descatha; Bradley A Evanoff
Journal:  Am J Ind Med       Date:  2019-11-06       Impact factor: 3.079

4.  Translational toxicology in setting occupational exposure limits for dusts and hazard classification - a critical evaluation of a recent approach to translate dust overload findings from rats to humans.

Authors:  Peter Morfeld; Joachim Bruch; Len Levy; Yufanyi Ngiewih; Ishrat Chaudhuri; Henry J Muranko; Ross Myerson; Robert J McCunney
Journal:  Part Fibre Toxicol       Date:  2015-04-23       Impact factor: 9.400

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.