Literature DB >> 12624288

Contrast-enhanced three-dimensional magnetic resonance angiography of atherosclerotic internal carotid stenosis as the noninvasive imaging modality in revascularization decision making.

Mirco Cosottini1, Alessandro Pingitore, Michele Puglioli, Maria Chiara Michelassi, Giancarlo Lupi, Arturo Abbruzzese, Rosa Calabrese, Massimo Lombardi, Giuliano Parenti, Carlo Bartolozzi.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: In patients with severe internal carotid artery stenoses, thromboendarterectomy significantly reduces both ischemic stroke and the risk of more ischemic attacks. Digital subtraction angiography (DSA) is the accepted preoperative test to determine whether a high-grade stenosis is present and requires surgical therapy. However, DSA has a procedural risk of stroke between 0.7% and 1%. An accurate, noninvasive imaging protocol with no risk of severe complications would significantly increase the benefit of surgical treatment. The aims of the study were (1) to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography (CEMRA) in detecting and grading internal carotid artery stenoses and (2) to assess the misclassification rate of vessels suitable for revascularization by CEMRA.
METHODS: Ninety-two patients with sonographic evidence of neck vessel stenosis were enrolled in the study. All patients were submitted to CEMRA and DSA. CEMRA images were evaluated for the presence of mild, moderate, or severe stenosis and occlusion.
RESULTS: Sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic accuracy were 97%, 82%, and 92.5%, respectively. Agreement with DSA was optimal at kappa=0.87. The misclassification rate of CEMRA was 3.1% because of its tendency to overestimate the stenosis.
CONCLUSIONS: The high diagnostic accuracy and limited misclassification rate suggest that CEMRA can be considered a powerful tool for the preoperative, noninvasive evaluation of atherosclerotic pathology of carotid arteries.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12624288     DOI: 10.1161/01.STR.0000057462.02141.6F

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stroke        ISSN: 0039-2499            Impact factor:   7.914


  11 in total

Review 1.  Update on surgical management for asymptomatic carotid stenosis.

Authors:  Margaret H Walkup; Peter L Faries
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 2.931

2.  Contrast-enhanced MR angiography of the carotid and vertebrobasilar circulations.

Authors:  Carina W Yang; James C Carr; Stephen F Futterer; Mark D Morasch; Benson P Yang; Stephanie M Shors; J Paul Finn
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 3.825

3.  MR angiography at 3 Tesla to assess proximal internal carotid artery stenoses: contrast-enhanced or 3D time-of-flight MR angiography?

Authors:  J Weber; P Veith; B Jung; G Ihorst; O Moske-Eick; S Meckel; H Urbach; C A Taschner
Journal:  Clin Neuroradiol       Date:  2014-01-03       Impact factor: 3.649

Review 4.  Management of extracranial carotid artery disease.

Authors:  Yinn Cher Ooi; Nestor R Gonzalez
Journal:  Cardiol Clin       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 2.213

5.  Redistribution of cerebropetal blood flow in patients with carotid artery stenosis measured non-invasively with fast cine phase contrast MR angiography.

Authors:  Mirco Cosottini; Alessandro Pingitore; Maria Chiara Michelassi; Michele Puglioli; Guido Lazzarotti; Michele Caniglia; Giuliano Parenti; Carlo Bartolozzi
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2004-10-16       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  Atherosclerotic Peripheral Vascular Disease Symposium II: vascular magnetic resonance and computed tomographic imaging.

Authors:  Shellie C Josephs; Howard A Rowley; Geoffrey D Rubin
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2008-12-16       Impact factor: 29.690

7.  Contrast-enhanced MR angiography vs intra-arterial digital subtraction angiography for carotid imaging: activity-based cost analysis.

Authors:  Jean Marie U-King-Im; William Hollingworth; Rikin A Trivedi; Justin J Cross; Nicholas J Higgins; Martin J Graves; Peter J Kirkpatrick; Nagui M Antoun; Jonathan H Gillard
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2003-11-14       Impact factor: 5.315

8.  Clinical relevance of gemstone spectral CT in the diagnosis of carotid atherosclerosis.

Authors:  Jing-Jian Wang; Shu-Jie Fan; Long-Long Wang; Yan-Zhong Gao; Xiao-Juan Liu
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2017-04-13       Impact factor: 2.447

Review 9.  Non-Invasive Monitoring of Human Health by Photoacoustic Spectroscopy.

Authors:  Yongyong Jin; Yonggang Yin; Chiye Li; Hongying Liu; Junhui Shi
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-03       Impact factor: 3.576

10.  Diagnostic accuracy of contrast-enhanced MR angiography in severe carotid stenosis: meta-analysis with metaregression of different techniques.

Authors:  Jan Menke
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2009-04-28       Impact factor: 5.315

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.