Literature DB >> 12623452

Psychological myths in e-learning.

Donald Clark1.   

Abstract

Traditional education and training has paid scant attention to the psychology of learning. Despite detailed research into motivation, distribution and reinforcement, most current methods of delivery still rely on a supply-led, lecture and classroom-based model that flies in the face of the theory. With e-learning we have a chance to reflect on this gap between theory and practice. E-learning, in the sense of web-based learning, is a new discipline but the psychology of learning has a much longer pedigree. This paper relates some common myths about e-learning back to some major themes in the psychology of learning. Is e-learning faster and more effective? Many people get the wrong learning at the wrong time. Can e-learning help with prerequisite knowledge? Should the learning be massed or distributed, i.e. all at once or little and often? There are also the issues of motivation and cognitive engagement. How can e-learning motivate learners or how can we motivate learners into using this new medium? What type of cognitive engagement is necessary for learning? Traditional 'sheep-dip' methods of learning are poor on reinforcement. Can e-learning help reinforce learning?

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12623452     DOI: 10.1080/0142159021000063916

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Teach        ISSN: 0142-159X            Impact factor:   3.650


  18 in total

Review 1.  e-Learning initiatives to support prescribing.

Authors:  Simon Maxwell; John Mucklow
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 4.335

2.  Online learning applied to a course on rational therapeutics: an international comparison between final year students of two medical schools.

Authors:  Robert Likic; Casey White; Sandro Cinti; Joel Purkiss; Joseph Fantone; Chris Chapman; Luka Bielen; Igor Francetic; Cary Engleberg
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 4.335

3.  Adapting web-based instruction to residents' knowledge improves learning efficiency: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  David A Cook; Thomas J Beckman; Kris G Thomas; Warren G Thompson
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 5.128

4.  Assessing the learning potential of an interactive digital game versus an interactive-style didactic lecture: the continued importance of didactic teaching in medical student education.

Authors:  Jesse Courtier; Emily M Webb; Andrew S Phelps; David M Naeger
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2016-08-31

5.  Engagement in E-learning opportunities: an empirical study on patient education using expectation confirmation theory.

Authors:  Hsin-Kai Chou; I-Chun Lin; Lin-Chung Woung; Ming-Tsu Tsai
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2010-11-23       Impact factor: 4.460

6.  Evaluating the Efficacy and Optimisation of the Peer-Led Flipped Model Using TEL Resources Within Neuroanatomy.

Authors:  Deepika Anbu; Alistair Robson; Octavia Kurn; Charles Taylor; Oliver Dean; December Payne; Eva Nagy; Charlotte Harrison; Samuel Hall; Scott Border
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2021       Impact factor: 2.622

7.  The acquisition and retention of ECG interpretation skills after a standardized web-based ECG tutorial-a randomised study.

Authors:  Signe Rolskov Bojsen; Sune Bernd Emil Werner Räder; Anders Gaardsdal Holst; Lars Kayser; Charlotte Ringsted; Jesper Hastrup Svendsen; Lars Konge
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2015-03-07       Impact factor: 2.463

8.  Experiences with E-learning in Ophthalmology.

Authors:  Seema Dutt Bandhu; Swati Raje
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 1.848

9.  Effective or just practical? An evaluation of an online postgraduate module on evidence-based medicine (EBM).

Authors:  Anke Rohwer; Taryn Young; Susan van Schalkwyk
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2013-05-27       Impact factor: 2.463

10.  An analysis of lecture video utilization in undergraduate medical education: associations with performance in the courses.

Authors:  John A McNulty; Amy Hoyt; Gregory Gruener; Arcot Chandrasekhar; Baltazar Espiritu; Ron Price; Ross Naheedy
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2009-01-27       Impact factor: 2.463

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.