Literature DB >> 12623041

Radiology review of the UKCCCR Breast Screening Frequency Trial: potential improvements in sensitivity and lead time of radiological signs.

R M L Warren1, J R Young, L McLean, K Lyons, A R M Wilson, A Evans, S W Duffy, I M Warsi.   

Abstract

AIM: To review all previous mammograms of breast cancer cases diagnosed during a randomized trial comparing 3 yearly to annual mammographic screening with a view to identifying and quantifying cases that might potentially have been diagnosed earlier.
METHODS: Mammograms of 602 breast cancer cases (399 screen-detected and 203 interval cases) were reviewed in chronological order and suspicious radiological features noted for each mammogram, up to and including the diagnostic mammogram.
RESULTS: Of the 602 cases, 79 (13%) had features at diagnosis that were visible on previous mammograms, suggesting a sensitivity of interpretation of 87%. A similar proportion of screen-detected (14%) and interval cancers (11%) had signs at diagnosis that were visible on previous mammograms. The potential for improvement was particularly noted for asymmetric density (sensitivity = 77%, average time visible before diagnosis 14 months) and parenchymal deformity/stellate lesion (sensitivity = 81%, average time visible before diagnosis 12 months).
CONCLUSION: The highest sensitivity was observed for comedo-type microcalcifications (sensitivity = 97%, average time visible before diagnosis 5 months). By improvements in sensitivity to asymmetric density and parenchymal deformity/stellate lesion, 4% of tumours could have their time of diagnosis advanced substantially.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12623041     DOI: 10.1053/crad.2002.1132

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Radiol        ISSN: 0009-9260            Impact factor:   2.350


  4 in total

Review 1.  [Workflow in digital screening mammography].

Authors:  U Bick; F Diekmann; E M Fallenberg
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 0.635

2.  Radiologic findings of screen-detected cancers in an organized population-based screening mammography program in Turkey.

Authors:  Arda Kayhan; Erkin Arıbal; Cennet Şahin; Ömür Can Taşçı; Sibel Özkan Gürdal; Enis Öztürk; Hayat Halide Hatipoğlu; Nilüfer Özaydın; Neslihan Cabioğlu; Beyza Özçınar; Vahit Özmen
Journal:  Diagn Interv Radiol       Date:  2016 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.630

3.  Prediction of higher mortality reduction for the UK Breast Screening Frequency Trial: a model-based approach on screening intervals.

Authors:  N T van Ravesteyn; E A M Heijnsdijk; G Draisma; H J de Koning
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2011-08-23       Impact factor: 7.640

4.  Percentage density, Wolfe's and Tabár's mammographic patterns: agreement and association with risk factors for breast cancer.

Authors:  Inger T Gram; Yngve Bremnes; Giske Ursin; Gertraud Maskarinec; Nils Bjurstam; Eiliv Lund
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2005-08-25       Impact factor: 6.466

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.