BACKGROUND: The role of mesalazine in preventing the clinical recurrence of Crohn's disease after surgery has been shown in a meta-analysis of all published studies. No clear relationship, however, has been shown between dosage and response. AIM: To evaluate whether 4.0 g/day of mesalazine may offer therapeutic advantages over 2.4 g/day in the prevention of both endoscopic and clinical post-operative recurrence of Crohn's disease. METHODS: The study was a double-blind, randomized, multi-centre, prospective, controlled clinical trial. Two hundred and six patients, submitted to first or second intestinal resection for Crohn's disease limited to the terminal ileum, with or without involvement of the caecum/ascending colon, were enrolled. Of these, 101 were randomly allocated to receive 4.0 g/day of mesalazine (Asacol, Giuliani SpA, Milan, Italy) and 105 to receive 2.4 g/day, starting 2 weeks after surgery. The primary outcome was endoscopic recurrence, at 12 months after surgery. Three different degrees of endoscopic recurrence were evaluated (endoscopic scores: > 0, > 1 and > 2). The secondary outcome was clinical recurrence, defined as a Crohn's disease activity index of more than 150 points or an increase in the Crohn's disease activity index of 100 points or more. For statistical analysis, chi-square, Wilcoxon and Cox regression model tests were used, when appropriate. RESULTS:Eighty-four patients in the 4.0 g/day group and 81 patients in the 2.4 g/day group were evaluable by endoscopy. Endoscopic recurrence of > 0 was significantly higher in the 2.4 g/day group than in the 4.0 g/day group (62% vs. 46%; P < 0.04). No difference was observed between the two groups with regard to the other two endoscopic outcomes (> 1 and > 2) or clinical recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: A 4.0 g/day regimen of mesalazine does not offer a clinically significant advantage over a 2.4 g/day regimen in the prevention of post-operative endoscopic and clinical recurrence of Crohn's disease at 1 year of follow-up.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: The role of mesalazine in preventing the clinical recurrence of Crohn's disease after surgery has been shown in a meta-analysis of all published studies. No clear relationship, however, has been shown between dosage and response. AIM: To evaluate whether 4.0 g/day of mesalazine may offer therapeutic advantages over 2.4 g/day in the prevention of both endoscopic and clinical post-operative recurrence of Crohn's disease. METHODS: The study was a double-blind, randomized, multi-centre, prospective, controlled clinical trial. Two hundred and six patients, submitted to first or second intestinal resection for Crohn's disease limited to the terminal ileum, with or without involvement of the caecum/ascending colon, were enrolled. Of these, 101 were randomly allocated to receive 4.0 g/day of mesalazine (Asacol, Giuliani SpA, Milan, Italy) and 105 to receive 2.4 g/day, starting 2 weeks after surgery. The primary outcome was endoscopic recurrence, at 12 months after surgery. Three different degrees of endoscopic recurrence were evaluated (endoscopic scores: > 0, > 1 and > 2). The secondary outcome was clinical recurrence, defined as a Crohn's disease activity index of more than 150 points or an increase in the Crohn's disease activity index of 100 points or more. For statistical analysis, chi-square, Wilcoxon and Cox regression model tests were used, when appropriate. RESULTS: Eighty-four patients in the 4.0 g/day group and 81 patients in the 2.4 g/day group were evaluable by endoscopy. Endoscopic recurrence of > 0 was significantly higher in the 2.4 g/day group than in the 4.0 g/day group (62% vs. 46%; P < 0.04). No difference was observed between the two groups with regard to the other two endoscopic outcomes (> 1 and > 2) or clinical recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: A 4.0 g/day regimen of mesalazine does not offer a clinically significant advantage over a 2.4 g/day regimen in the prevention of post-operative endoscopic and clinical recurrence of Crohn's disease at 1 year of follow-up.
Authors: R Caprilli; M A Gassull; J C Escher; G Moser; P Munkholm; A Forbes; D W Hommes; H Lochs; E Angelucci; A Cocco; B Vucelic; H Hildebrand; S Kolacek; L Riis; M Lukas; R de Franchis; M Hamilton; G Jantschek; P Michetti; C O'Morain; M M Anwar; J L Freitas; I A Mouzas; F Baert; R Mitchell; C J Hawkey Journal: Gut Date: 2006-03 Impact factor: 23.059