Literature DB >> 12622737

The pattern of segment formation, as revealed by engrailed expression, in a centipede with a variable number of segments.

Chris Kettle1, Jenni Johnstone, Trevor Jowett, Helen Arthur, Wallace Arthur.   

Abstract

Arthropods vary enormously in segment number, from less than 20 to more than 200. This between-species variation must have originated, in evolution, through divergent selection operating in ancestral arthropod species with variable segment numbers. Although most present-day arthropod species are invariant in this respect, some are variable and so can serve as model systems. Here, we describe a study based on one such species, the coastal geophilomorph centipede Strigamia maritima. We investigate the way in which segments are formed using in situ hybridization to demonstrate the expression pattern of the engrailed gene during embryogenesis. We also analyze segment number data in mother-offspring broods and thereby demonstrate a significant heritable component of the variation. We consider how natural selection might act on this intraspecific developmental variation, and we discuss the similarities and differences in segment formation between the geophilomorphs and their phylogenetic sister-group.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12622737     DOI: 10.1046/j.1525-142x.2003.03027.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evol Dev        ISSN: 1520-541X            Impact factor:   1.930


  10 in total

1.  Roles of Hox genes in the patterning of the central nervous system of Drosophila.

Authors:  Alicia Estacio-Gómez; Fernando J Díaz-Benjumea
Journal:  Fly (Austin)       Date:  2013-12-05       Impact factor: 2.160

2.  Relationship between the species-representative phenotype and intraspecific variation in Ranunculaceae floral organ and Asteraceae flower numbers.

Authors:  Miho S Kitazawa; Koichi Fujimoto
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2016-04-06       Impact factor: 4.357

3.  Evolution of an insect-specific GROUCHO-interaction motif in the ENGRAILED selector protein.

Authors:  Chris Todd Hittinger; Sean B Carroll
Journal:  Evol Dev       Date:  2008 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.930

4.  The complete mitochondrial genome of the geophilomorph centipede Strigamia maritima.

Authors:  Helen E Robertson; François Lapraz; Adelaide C Rhodes; Maximilian J Telford
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-03-20       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  A developmental basis for stochasticity in floral organ numbers.

Authors:  Miho S Kitazawa; Koichi Fujimoto
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2014-11-03       Impact factor: 5.753

6.  Lack of evidence for conserved parasegmental grooves in arthropods.

Authors:  Ralf Janssen; Natascha Turetzek; Matthias Pechmann
Journal:  Dev Genes Evol       Date:  2022-01-17       Impact factor: 0.900

7.  Ancestral patterning of tergite formation in a centipede suggests derived mode of trunk segmentation in trilobites.

Authors:  Javier Ortega-Hernández; Carlo Brena
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-12-28       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Evolution of the pair rule gene network: Insights from a centipede.

Authors:  Jack Green; Michael Akam
Journal:  Dev Biol       Date:  2013-06-26       Impact factor: 3.582

9.  An analysis of segmentation dynamics throughout embryogenesis in the centipede Strigamia maritima.

Authors:  Carlo Brena; Michael Akam
Journal:  BMC Biol       Date:  2013-11-29       Impact factor: 7.431

10.  The first myriapod genome sequence reveals conservative arthropod gene content and genome organisation in the centipede Strigamia maritima.

Authors:  Ariel D Chipman; David E K Ferrier; Carlo Brena; Jiaxin Qu; Daniel S T Hughes; Reinhard Schröder; Montserrat Torres-Oliva; Nadia Znassi; Huaiyang Jiang; Francisca C Almeida; Claudio R Alonso; Zivkos Apostolou; Peshtewani Aqrawi; Wallace Arthur; Jennifer C J Barna; Kerstin P Blankenburg; Daniela Brites; Salvador Capella-Gutiérrez; Marcus Coyle; Peter K Dearden; Louis Du Pasquier; Elizabeth J Duncan; Dieter Ebert; Cornelius Eibner; Galina Erikson; Peter D Evans; Cassandra G Extavour; Liezl Francisco; Toni Gabaldón; William J Gillis; Elizabeth A Goodwin-Horn; Jack E Green; Sam Griffiths-Jones; Cornelis J P Grimmelikhuijzen; Sai Gubbala; Roderic Guigó; Yi Han; Frank Hauser; Paul Havlak; Luke Hayden; Sophie Helbing; Michael Holder; Jerome H L Hui; Julia P Hunn; Vera S Hunnekuhl; LaRonda Jackson; Mehwish Javaid; Shalini N Jhangiani; Francis M Jiggins; Tamsin E Jones; Tobias S Kaiser; Divya Kalra; Nathan J Kenny; Viktoriya Korchina; Christie L Kovar; F Bernhard Kraus; François Lapraz; Sandra L Lee; Jie Lv; Christigale Mandapat; Gerard Manning; Marco Mariotti; Robert Mata; Tittu Mathew; Tobias Neumann; Irene Newsham; Dinh N Ngo; Maria Ninova; Geoffrey Okwuonu; Fiona Ongeri; William J Palmer; Shobha Patil; Pedro Patraquim; Christopher Pham; Ling-Ling Pu; Nicholas H Putman; Catherine Rabouille; Olivia Mendivil Ramos; Adelaide C Rhodes; Helen E Robertson; Hugh M Robertson; Matthew Ronshaugen; Julio Rozas; Nehad Saada; Alejandro Sánchez-Gracia; Steven E Scherer; Andrew M Schurko; Kenneth W Siggens; DeNard Simmons; Anna Stief; Eckart Stolle; Maximilian J Telford; Kristin Tessmar-Raible; Rebecca Thornton; Maurijn van der Zee; Arndt von Haeseler; James M Williams; Judith H Willis; Yuanqing Wu; Xiaoyan Zou; Daniel Lawson; Donna M Muzny; Kim C Worley; Richard A Gibbs; Michael Akam; Stephen Richards
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2014-11-25       Impact factor: 8.029

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.