Literature DB >> 12622482

Electrodiagnostic challenges in the evaluation of lumbar spinal stenosis.

Christopher T Plastaras1.   

Abstract

Taken together, the most common electromyographic finding in lumbar spinal stenosis is bilateral multilevel radiculopathy. The sensitivity of electrodiagnostic testing for radiculopathy is difficult to quantify because there is no criterion standard. Differentiating peripheral neuropathy and lumbar spinal stenosis on electromyography and routine nerve-conduction studies can be clinically challenging, especially when the two entities may be present simultaneously in older patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12622482     DOI: 10.1016/s1047-9651(02)00050-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am        ISSN: 1047-9651            Impact factor:   1.784


  5 in total

1.  A prospective, masked 18-month minimum follow-up on neurophysiologic changes in persons with spinal stenosis, low back pain, and no symptoms.

Authors:  Andrew J Haig; Karen S J Yamakawa; Christopher Parres; Anthony Chiodo; Henry Tong
Journal:  PM R       Date:  2009-02-03       Impact factor: 2.298

2.  Motor skill training induces changes in the excitability of the leg cortical area in healthy humans.

Authors:  Monica A Perez; Bjarke K S Lungholt; Kathinka Nyborg; Jens B Nielsen
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-07-28       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Can Foraminal Stenosis Due to Lumbar Isthmic Spondylolisthesis Cause Axonopathy in the Lower Extremity?

Authors:  Seong Hyeon Jo; Jang Hyuk Cho; Dong Gyu Lee
Journal:  Healthcare (Basel)       Date:  2021-04-28

4.  Findings of Electrodiagnostic Studies in Moderate to Severe Lumbar Central Spinal Stenosis-Electrodiagnostic Studies in Lumbar Central Spinal Stenosis.

Authors:  Min Cheol Chang; Donghwi Park
Journal:  Healthcare (Basel)       Date:  2021-02-03

5.  Dermatomal somatosensory evoked potentials and cortical somatosensory evoked potentials assessment in congenital scoliosis.

Authors:  Zhenxing Zhang; Yi Wang; Tao Luo; Huaguang Qi; Lin Cai; Yang Yuan; Jingfeng Li
Journal:  BMC Neurol       Date:  2022-02-15       Impact factor: 2.474

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.