Literature DB >> 12622311

Do life events have their effect on psychosis by influencing the emotional reactivity to daily life stress?

I Myin-Germeys1, L Krabbendam, P A E G Delespaul, J Van Os.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Life events (LE) have consistently been found to influence course and outcome of psychotic disorders. However, the mechanism through which they operate is not known. The present study investigated whether LE have their effect by impacting on the emotional sensitivity for daily hassles.
METHOD: Patients with clinically remitted psychotic illness (N=42) were studied with the Experience Sampling Method (a structured diary technique assessing current context and mood in daily life) to assess: (1) appraised subjective stress related to daily events and activities; and (2) emotional reactivity conceptualized as changes in both negative affect (NA) and positive affect (PA). LE were assessed with the Brown & Harris Life Event and Difficulties Schedule.
RESULTS: Multilevel regression analyses showed that previous exposure to LE influenced the appraised stressfulness of neither daily events nor the activities in which the subjects were involved. However, a history of LE did modify the emotional reaction to daily life stress, both in models predicting NA and in models predicting PA.
CONCLUSIONS: By their cumulative effect on emotional reactivity to daily activities and events, LE may render individuals more vulnerable to the onset or persistence of psychotic experiences.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12622311     DOI: 10.1017/s0033291702006785

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Med        ISSN: 0033-2917            Impact factor:   7.723


  34 in total

1.  Can antistigma campaigns be improved? A test of the impact of biogenetic vs psychosocial causal explanations on implicit and explicit attitudes to schizophrenia.

Authors:  Tania M Lincoln; Elisabeth Arens; Cornelia Berger; Winfried Rief
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2007-12-01       Impact factor: 9.306

Review 2.  Psychosocial stress and psychosis. A review of the neurobiological mechanisms and the evidence for gene-stress interaction.

Authors:  Ruud van Winkel; Nicholas C Stefanis; Inez Myin-Germeys
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2008-08-20       Impact factor: 9.306

3.  Computerized experience sampling method (ESMc): assessing feasibility and validity among individuals with schizophrenia.

Authors:  David Kimhy; Philippe Delespaul; Cheryl Corcoran; Hongshik Ahn; Scott Yale; Dolores Malaspina
Journal:  J Psychiatr Res       Date:  2005-11-21       Impact factor: 4.791

4.  Lifetime Stress Exposure and Health: A Review of Contemporary Assessment Methods and Biological Mechanisms.

Authors:  Grant S Shields; George M Slavich
Journal:  Soc Personal Psychol Compass       Date:  2017-08-03

5.  Experience sampling methodology in mental health research: new insights and technical developments.

Authors:  Inez Myin-Germeys; Zuzana Kasanova; Thomas Vaessen; Hugo Vachon; Olivia Kirtley; Wolfgang Viechtbauer; Ulrich Reininghaus
Journal:  World Psychiatry       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 49.548

Review 6.  Stress and neurodevelopmental processes in the emergence of psychosis.

Authors:  C W Holtzman; H D Trotman; S M Goulding; A T Ryan; A N Macdonald; D I Shapiro; J L Brasfield; E F Walker
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2013-01-05       Impact factor: 3.590

7.  Daily life evidence of environment-incongruent emotion in schizophrenia.

Authors:  Amy H Sanchez; Lindsey M Lavaysse; Jessica N Starr; David E Gard
Journal:  Psychiatry Res       Date:  2014-07-28       Impact factor: 3.222

Review 8.  Does the concept of "sensitization" provide a plausible mechanism for the putative link between the environment and schizophrenia?

Authors:  Dina Collip; Inez Myin-Germeys; Jim Van Os
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2008-01-18       Impact factor: 9.306

Review 9.  Brain circuit dysfunction in a distinct subset of chronic psychotic patients.

Authors:  Morris B Goldman
Journal:  Schizophr Res       Date:  2014-07-01       Impact factor: 4.939

Review 10.  Ambulatory assessment.

Authors:  Timothy J Trull; Ulrich Ebner-Priemer
Journal:  Annu Rev Clin Psychol       Date:  2012-11-13       Impact factor: 18.561

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.