Literature DB >> 12621897

Home hygiene: a risk approach.

Sally F Bloomfield1.   

Abstract

The need to place "prevention through hygiene" at the core of strategies for infection prevention has been emphasised by recent events. Indications are that re-evaluation of current practice and the promotion of improved hygiene in the domestic setting could have a significant impact in reducing infectious disease. If the public are to play a part however they must be properly informed. Encouraging the concept of the home as a setting in which the whole range of activities occur, including food hygiene, personal hygiene and hygiene related to medical care, provides the opportunity for a rational approach to home hygiene based on risk assessment. In the home surfaces (including hand surfaces) and other sites play an important part in the transmission of infection, especially food-borne infections. From an assessment of the frequency of occurrence of pathogens and potential pathogens at reservoirs, disseminators and hand and food contact sites together with the potential for transfer within the home, the risks of exposure can be assessed. This can be used to develop a rational approach in which effective hygiene procedures involving cleaning and disinfection as appropriate are targeted at these sites to reduce risks of cross contamination. This approach is consistent with the view that good home hygiene is not about "getting rid of household germs" but about targeting hygiene measures appropriately to reduce exposure to germs and thereby prevent cross infection. In motivating change, education programmes must take account of concerns related to antimicrobial resistance, the environment and the "health" of the immune system.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12621897     DOI: 10.1078/1438-4639-00193

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Hyg Environ Health        ISSN: 1438-4639            Impact factor:   5.840


  6 in total

1.  Personal hygiene among military personnel: developing and testing a self-administered scale.

Authors:  Mohsen Saffari; Harold G Koenig; Amir H Pakpour; Hormoz Sanaeinasab; Hojat Rshidi Jahan; Mohammad Gamal Sehlo
Journal:  Environ Health Prev Med       Date:  2013-11-06       Impact factor: 3.674

2.  Quantifying the costs and benefits of occupational health and safety interventions at a Bangladesh shipbuilding company.

Authors:  Irene Thiede; Michael Thiede
Journal:  Int J Occup Environ Health       Date:  2015-01-14

Review 3.  Mobile Colistin Resistance (mcr) Genes in Cats and Dogs and Their Zoonotic Transmission Risks.

Authors:  Afaf Hamame; Bernard Davoust; Zineb Cherak; Jean-Marc Rolain; Seydina M Diene
Journal:  Pathogens       Date:  2022-06-17

4.  Underestimated Risks of Infantile Infectious Disease from the Caregiver's Typical Handling Practices of Infant Formula.

Authors:  Tae Jin Cho; Ji Yeon Hwang; Hye Won Kim; Yong Ki Kim; Jeong Il Kwon; Young Jun Kim; Kwang Won Lee; Sun Ae Kim; Min Suk Rhee
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-07-05       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Owners' perception of acquiring infections through raw pet food: a comprehensive internet-based survey.

Authors:  Johanna Anturaniemi; Stella Maria Barrouin-Melo; Sara Zaldivar-López; Hanna Sinkko; Anna Hielm-Björkman
Journal:  Vet Rec       Date:  2019-08-19       Impact factor: 2.695

6.  Reproductive effects of occupational DDT exposure among male malaria control workers.

Authors:  Félix Salazar-García; Esperanza Gallardo-Díaz; Prudencia Cerón-Mireles; Dana Loomis; Victor H Borja-Aburto
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 9.031

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.