Literature DB >> 12621602

Center of body mass and the evolution of female body shape.

Bogusław Pawłowski1, Marzena Grabarczyk.   

Abstract

Among primates, the genus Homo has a unique sexual dimorphism in general body shape. The stenotypic female "hourglass figure" has often been attributed to sexual selection. Sexual dimorphism both in shape and in position of the center of body mass (CoM) emerges during puberty and is related to hormonal influences. These are only the proximal and not the ultimate causes of this feature. This article explores the hypothesis that the evolutionary (i.e., ultimate) reason for female body shape and male preference for a lower waist-to-hip ratio (WHR) is due to the acquisition of bipedal locomotion and different biomechanical constraints on each sex. The demands of pregnancy and subsequently carrying infants may have more tightly constrained CoM in females than in males. A lower-position of CoM relative to height (RCoM=(CoM/height)*100%) would contribute to better stability during pregnancy and infant carrying. Using body measurements from 119 female students, we show that RCoM correlates negatively with only maximal thigh circumference and positively with only WHR and shoulder width. The relationship between RCoM and traits that best characterize female body shape seems to confirm a hypothesis of biomechanical selection pressure that may have acted on Homo female morphology, thus contributing to sexual dimorphism. Copyright 2003 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12621602     DOI: 10.1002/ajhb.10136

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Hum Biol        ISSN: 1042-0533            Impact factor:   1.937


  7 in total

1.  Ontogenetic changes in the internal and external morphology of the ilium in modern humans.

Authors:  Richard Abel; Gabriele A Macho
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 2.610

2.  Substantial but Misunderstood Human Sexual Dimorphism Results Mainly From Sexual Selection on Males and Natural Selection on Females.

Authors:  William D Lassek; Steven J C Gaulin
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-05-17

3.  Theoretical analysis of the mechanisms of a gender differentiation in the propensity for orthostatic intolerance after spaceflight.

Authors:  Richard L Summers; Steven Platts; Jerry G Myers; Thomas G Coleman
Journal:  Theor Biol Med Model       Date:  2010-03-18       Impact factor: 2.432

Review 4.  Sexual Dimorphism and the Origins of Human Spinal Health.

Authors:  Vicente Gilsanz; Tishya A L Wren; Skorn Ponrartana; Stefano Mora; Clifford J Rosen
Journal:  Endocr Rev       Date:  2018-04-01       Impact factor: 19.871

5.  Normative Performance on the Balance Error Scoring System by Youth, High School, and Collegiate Athletes.

Authors:  Sarah J Ozinga; Susan M Linder; Mandy Miller Koop; Tanujit Dey; Richard Figler; Andrew N Russman; Richard So; Alan H Rosenthal; Jason Cruickshank; Jay L Alberts
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2018-08-15       Impact factor: 2.860

6.  The Lumbar Lordosis in Males and Females, Revisited.

Authors:  Ori Hay; Gali Dar; Janan Abbas; Dan Stein; Hila May; Youssef Masharawi; Nathan Peled; Israel Hershkovitz
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-08-24       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Assessment of waist-to-hip ratio attractiveness in women: an anthropometric analysis of digital silhouettes.

Authors:  Krzysztof Kościński
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  2013-08-24
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.