Literature DB >> 12621335

Usher syndrome and cochlear implantation.

Natalie Loundon1, Sandrine Marlin, Denise Busquet, Françoise Denoyelle, Gilles Roger, Francis Renaud, Erea Noel Garabedian.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the symptoms leading to diagnosis and the quality of rehabilitation after cochlear implantation in Usher syndrome. STUDY
DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study.
SETTING: ENT department of a tertiary referral hospital. PATIENTS: Among 210 patients given an implantation in the Ear, Nose, and Throat department, 185 were congenitally deaf and 13 had Usher syndrome (7.0%). Five had a family history of Usher, and eight were sporadic cases. Eleven cases were Usher type I, one was Usher type III, and one was not classified. The age at implantation ranged from 18 months to 44 years (mean, 6 years 1 month). The mean follow-up was 52 months (range, 9 months to 9 years). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: All patients had audiophonological and clinical examination, computed tomography scan of the temporal bones, ophthalmologic examination with fundoscopy, and an electroretinogram. Cerebral magnetic resonance imaging and vestibular examination were performed in 9 of 13 and 10 of 13 cases, respectively. Logopedic outcome measured preimplant and postimplant closed- and open-set word recognition and oral expression at follow-up.
RESULTS: The most frequent initial sign of Usher syndrome was delayed walking, with a mean age of 20 months. Among the 172 other congenitally deaf children with implants, when deafness was not associated with other neurologic disorders, the mean age at walking was 14 months (p < 0.001). The fundoscopy was always abnormal after the age of 5 years, and the electroretinogram was abnormal in all cases. Vestibular function was abnormal in all but one case (nonclassified). The computed tomography scan and the magnetic resonance imaging were always normal. Logopedic results with cochlear implants showed good perception skills in all but one case. The best perceptive results were obtained in children implanted before the age of 9 years. Oral language had significantly progressed in 9 of 13 at follow-up. There was no relation between the visual acuity and the logopedic results.
CONCLUSION: The earliest clinical sign associated with deafness evoking Usher syndrome is late walking. The electroretinogram is the only reliable examination to enable the diagnosis. When severe profound deafness is associated with late walking, the electroretinogram should be systematically proposed. Logopedic results are linked to precocity of implantation, and early Usher's diagnosis contributes to optimize speech therapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12621335     DOI: 10.1097/00129492-200303000-00015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Otol Neurotol        ISSN: 1531-7129            Impact factor:   2.311


  12 in total

Review 1.  Genetics and pathological mechanisms of Usher syndrome.

Authors:  Denise Yan; Xue Z Liu
Journal:  J Hum Genet       Date:  2010-04-09       Impact factor: 3.172

Review 2.  Cochlear implantation in common forms of genetic deafness.

Authors:  Richard J Vivero; Kenneth Fan; Simon Angeli; Thomas J Balkany; Xue Z Liu
Journal:  Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2010-07-22       Impact factor: 1.675

3.  Outcomes of cochlear implantation in children with Usher syndrome: a long-term observation.

Authors:  Agnieszka Remjasz-Jurek; Pedro Clarós; Astrid Clarós-Pujol; Carmen Pujol; Andrés Clarós
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2022-10-15       Impact factor: 3.236

4.  Profound, prelingual nonsyndromic deafness maps to chromosome 10q21 and is caused by a novel missense mutation in the Usher syndrome type IF gene PCDH15.

Authors:  Lance Doucette; Nancy D Merner; Sandra Cooke; Elizabeth Ives; Dante Galutira; Vanessa Walsh; Tom Walsh; Linda MacLaren; Tracey Cater; Bridget Fernandez; Jane S Green; Edward R Wilcox; Lawrence I Shotland; Larry Shotland; Xiaoyan Cindy Li; X C Li; Ming Lee; Mary-Claire King; Terry-Lynn Young
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2008-12-24       Impact factor: 4.246

5.  "Minimized rotational vestibular testing" as a screening procedure detecting vestibular areflexy in deaf children: screening cochlear implant candidates for Usher syndrome type I.

Authors:  Magnus Teschner; Juergen Neuburger; Roland Gockeln; Thomas Lenarz; Anke Lesinski-Schiedat
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2007-12-06       Impact factor: 2.503

6.  Frequency of Usher syndrome in two pediatric populations: Implications for genetic screening of deaf and hard of hearing children.

Authors:  William J Kimberling; Michael S Hildebrand; A Eliot Shearer; Maren L Jensen; Jennifer A Halder; Karmen Trzupek; Edward S Cohn; Richard G Weleber; Edwin M Stone; Richard J H Smith
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 8.822

Review 7.  Usher syndrome IIIA: a review of the disorder and preclinical research advances in therapeutic approaches.

Authors:  Azmi Marouf; Benjamin Johnson; Kumar N Alagramam
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2022-03-23       Impact factor: 4.132

8.  Outcomes of Late Implantation in Usher Syndrome Patients.

Authors:  Ana Cristina H Hoshino; Agustina Echegoyen; Maria Valéria Schmidt Goffi-Gomez; Robinson Koji Tsuji; Ricardo Ferreira Bento
Journal:  Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2016-05-04

Review 9.  Prevalence of various etiologies of hearing loss among cochlear implant recipients: Systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Niels Krintel Petersen; Anders W Jørgensen; Therese Ovesen
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2015-10-08       Impact factor: 2.117

10.  Speech, language, and hearing function in twins with Alport syndrome: A seven-year retrospective case report.

Authors:  Ramesh Kaipa; Hannah Tether
Journal:  J Otol       Date:  2017-03-21
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.