OBJECTIVE: To clarify the biomechanical indicators of single- and multi-level stenosis and to determine the biomechanical outcome of selective conservative decompression. DESIGN: This study is a prospective clinical trial examining trunk function in spinal stenosis patients operated using a conservative procedure in an orthopaedic clinic. BACKGROUND: Although several clinical studies have examined the instability and motion characteristics of operated lumbar spinal canal stenosis, few if any studies have prospectively examined the biomechanical outcome of lumbar spinal canal stenosis surgery. METHODS: Comprehensive pre- and post-operative trunk dynamometer strength and motion analysis tests were performed on 36 patients operated for lumbar canal stenosis. Surgical treatment efficacy was evaluated within a three variable crossed factorial design considering stenosis classification, number of operative levels, and changes in several trunk biomechanical outcomes from pre- to post-operative assessment. Patients were evaluated after a minimum one-year follow-up. RESULTS: Pre-operatively there were no differential effects associated with stenosis classification or number of operated levels. There was a significant post-operative increase in isometric trunk extension torque and flexion-extension power and a return to a more normal trunk extension-flexion torque ratio. Patients with mixed, single level stenosis demonstrated greater trunk extension power both pre- and post-operatively compared to other patients. CONCLUSIONS: Conservative surgical treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis produced a marked improvement in the functional mechanical status of the low back. RELEVANCE: This study assists clinicians and researchers to understand trunk function following conservative surgical treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis.
OBJECTIVE: To clarify the biomechanical indicators of single- and multi-level stenosis and to determine the biomechanical outcome of selective conservative decompression. DESIGN: This study is a prospective clinical trial examining trunk function in spinal stenosispatients operated using a conservative procedure in an orthopaedic clinic. BACKGROUND: Although several clinical studies have examined the instability and motion characteristics of operated lumbar spinal canal stenosis, few if any studies have prospectively examined the biomechanical outcome of lumbar spinal canal stenosis surgery. METHODS: Comprehensive pre- and post-operative trunk dynamometer strength and motion analysis tests were performed on 36 patients operated for lumbar canal stenosis. Surgical treatment efficacy was evaluated within a three variable crossed factorial design considering stenosis classification, number of operative levels, and changes in several trunk biomechanical outcomes from pre- to post-operative assessment. Patients were evaluated after a minimum one-year follow-up. RESULTS: Pre-operatively there were no differential effects associated with stenosis classification or number of operated levels. There was a significant post-operative increase in isometric trunk extension torque and flexion-extension power and a return to a more normal trunk extension-flexion torque ratio. Patients with mixed, single level stenosis demonstrated greater trunk extension power both pre- and post-operatively compared to other patients. CONCLUSIONS: Conservative surgical treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis produced a marked improvement in the functional mechanical status of the low back. RELEVANCE: This study assists clinicians and researchers to understand trunk function following conservative surgical treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis.
Authors: Federico Balagué; Evelyne Bibbo; Christian Mélot; Marek Szpalski; Robert Gunzburg; Tony S Keller Journal: Eur Spine J Date: 2009-09-22 Impact factor: 3.134