Literature DB >> 12620594

Affective associative learning modifies the sensory perception of nociceptive stimuli without participant's awareness.

Annabel Wunsch1, Pierre Philippot, Léon Plaghki.   

Abstract

The present experiment examined the possibility to change the sensory and/or the affective perception of thermal stimuli by an emotional associative learning procedure known to operate without participants' awareness (evaluative conditioning). In a mixed design, an aversive conditioning procedure was compared between subjects to an appetitive conditioning procedure. Both groups were also compared within-subject to a control condition (neutral conditioning). The aversive conditioning was induced by associating non-painful and painful thermal stimuli - delivered on the right forearm - with unpleasant slides. The appetitive conditioning consisted in an association between thermal stimuli - also delivered on the right forearm - and pleasant slides. The control condition consisted in an association between thermal stimuli - delivered for all participants on the left forearm - and neutral slides. The effects of the conditioning procedures on the sensory and affective dimensions were evaluated with visual analogue scale (VAS)-intensity and VAS-unpleasantness. Startle reflex was used as a physiological index of emotional valence disposition. Results confirmed that no participants were aware of the conditioning procedure. After unpleasant slides (aversive conditioning), non-painful and painful thermal stimuli were judged more intense and more unpleasant than when preceded by neutral slides (control condition) or pleasant slides (appetitive conditioning). Despite a strong correlation between the intensity and the unpleasantness scales, effects were weaker for the affective scale and, became statistically non-significant when VAS-intensity was used as covariate. This experiment shows that it is possible to modify the perception of intensity of thermal stimuli by a non-conscious learning procedure based on the transfer of the valence of the unconditioned stimuli (pleasant or unpleasant slides) towards the conditioned stimuli (non-painful and painful thermal stimuli). These results plead for a conception of pain as a conscious output of complex informational processes all of which are not accessible to participants' awareness. Mechanisms by which affective input may influence sensory experience and clinical implications of the present study are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12620594     DOI: 10.1016/s0304-3959(02)00331-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pain        ISSN: 0304-3959            Impact factor:   6.961


  10 in total

Review 1.  Emotion and pain: a functional cerebral systems integration.

Authors:  Gina A Mollet; David W Harrison
Journal:  Neuropsychol Rev       Date:  2006-09-28       Impact factor: 7.444

Review 2.  The role of positive affect in pain and its treatment.

Authors:  Patrick H Finan; Eric L Garland
Journal:  Clin J Pain       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 3.442

3.  Negative affect heightens opiate withdrawal-induced hyperalgesia in heroin dependent individuals.

Authors:  Luis M Carcoba; Arturo E Contreras; Antonio Cepeda-Benito; Mary W Meagher
Journal:  J Addict Dis       Date:  2011 Jul-Sep

Review 4.  [Studies on cerebral processing of pain using functional imaging : Somatosensory, emotional, cognitive, autonomic and motor aspects].

Authors:  M Valet; T Sprenger; T R Tölle
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 1.107

5.  Visceral pain perception in patients with irritable bowel syndrome and healthy volunteers is affected by the MRI scanner environment.

Authors:  Reuben K Wong; Lukas Van Oudenhove; Xinhua Li; Yang Cao; Khek Yu Ho; Clive H Wilder-Smith
Journal:  United European Gastroenterol J       Date:  2015-04-09       Impact factor: 4.623

6.  Brain moderators supporting the relationship between depressive mood and pain.

Authors:  Adrienne L Adler-Neal; Nichole M Emerson; Suzan R Farris; Youngkyoo Jung; Robert C Coghill; Fadel Zeidan
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 7.926

7.  A Bayesian perspective on sensory and cognitive integration in pain perception and placebo analgesia.

Authors:  Davide Anchisi; Marco Zanon
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-02-09       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Disrupted physical pain sensation by social exclusion in women with dysmenorrhea.

Authors:  WenJun Yu; Fang Guan; Li Fu; Cheng Long; Li Yang
Journal:  J Pain Res       Date:  2018-08-03       Impact factor: 3.133

9.  Hyperalgesia when observing pain-related images is a genuine bias in perception and enhances autonomic responses.

Authors:  Anaïs Chapon; Caroline Perchet; Luis Garcia-Larrea; Maud Frot
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-10-24       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Respondent learning in chronic pain: how precise is imprecision?

Authors:  Xaver Fuchs; Susanne Becker; Dieter Kleinböhl; Martin Diers; Herta Flor
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 7.926

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.