Literature DB >> 12618641

Personalized targeted mailing increases mammography among long-term noncompliant medicare beneficiaries: a randomized trial.

R Van Harrison1, Nancy K Janz, Robert A Wolfe, Philip J Tedeschi, Michael Chernew, Jeoffrey K Stross, Xuelin Huang, Laurence F McMahon.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The study purpose was to increase mammography screening among older women by identifying female Medicare beneficiaries without a recent mammogram and assesses the cost-effectiveness of a personalized targeted mailing encouraging them to have a mammogram.
METHODS: A randomized paired controlled trial included 1229 pairs of women matched on zip code, race, and urban or rural county. Postintervention mammography claims were measured from November 1997 through December 1998. The subjects were female Medicare beneficiaries age > or = 70, living in Michigan for > or = 5 years, having no significant comorbidity likely to affect screening, and no mammogram for > or = 5 years. Intervention subjects received a personally addressed letter from the Medical Director of Michigan Medicare with materials emphasizing the individual's lack of use of the Medicare mammography screening benefit, reasons for screening, and how to be screened.
RESULTS: Women who received the mailing were 60% more likely to have a subsequent mammogram (OR 1.6, P <0.005), with diagnostic mammograms increasing more than screening mammograms (2.8% vs. 0.8%). The absolute increase was greatest for women age 70 to 79, 10.6% in the intervention group versus 6.5% for controls, odds ratio 1.7 (P <0.02). A statewide Medicare intervention in Michigan would cost of 108,000 US dollars to 238,000 US dollars, producing 3500 to 4300 additional mammograms at 31 US dollars to 55 US dollars per additional mammogram.
CONCLUSION: The intervention increased mammography among long-term noncompliant older women, particularly increasing diagnostic mammograms. This approach can be directly implemented in other states and nationally. It may also be useful for other preventive services.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12618641     DOI: 10.1097/01.MLR.0000053020.30060.F2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Care        ISSN: 0025-7079            Impact factor:   2.983


  5 in total

Review 1.  Email consultations in health care: 1--scope and effectiveness.

Authors:  Josip Car; Aziz Sheikh
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2004-08-21

2.  A randomized controlled trial to increase cancer screening among attendees of community health centers.

Authors:  Richard G Roetzheim; Lisa K Christman; Paul B Jacobsen; Alan B Cantor; Jennifer Schroeder; Rania Abdulla; Seft Hunter; Thomas N Chirikos; Jeffrey P Krischer
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2004 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 5.166

3.  Assessment of Knowledge and Screening in Oral, Breast, and Cervical Cancer in the Population of the Northeast Region of India.

Authors:  Kunal Oswal; Rishav Kanodia; Akash Pradhan; Umakant Nadkar; Mahendra Avhad; Ramachandran Venkataramanan; Lakshman Sethuraman; Carlo Caduff; Arnie Purushotham
Journal:  JCO Glob Oncol       Date:  2020-04

4.  Developing a Provincial Surveillance and Support System for Childhood Cancer Survivors: Multiphase User-Centered Design Study.

Authors:  Jennifer Shuldiner; Nida Shah; Catherine Reis; Ian Chalmers; Noah Ivers; Paul Nathan
Journal:  JMIR Hum Factors       Date:  2022-09-13

5.  Using a state cancer registry to recruit young breast cancer survivors and high-risk relatives: protocol of a randomized trial testing the efficacy of a targeted versus a tailored intervention to increase breast cancer screening.

Authors:  Maria C Katapodi; Laurel L Northouse; Ann M Schafenacker; Debra Duquette; Sonia A Duffy; David L Ronis; Beth Anderson; Nancy K Janz; Jennifer McLosky; Kara J Milliron; Sofia D Merajver; Linh M Duong; Glenn Copeland
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2013-03-01       Impact factor: 4.430

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.