Literature DB >> 12618161

Women awaiting hysterectomy: a qualitative study of issues involved in decisions about oophorectomy.

Vanita Bhavnani1, Aileen Clarke.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Women awaiting abdominal hysterectomy have a further decision to take--whether or not to undergo a prophylactic oophorectomy. Prophylactic oophorectomy (removal of healthy ovaries) is commonly undertaken as an adjunct to hysterectomy to prevent ovarian cancer in women who are already having a hysterectomy for menorrhagia, fibroids or severe menstrual pain. It causes an immediate 'surgical menopause'--women no longer produce endogenous oestrogens and they are advised to take hormone replacement therapy (HRT). This descriptive study was undertaken as part of a larger pilot study.
DESIGN: Qualitative interviewing study.
SETTING: Hospital outpatient departments in southern England. SAMPLE: Women on waiting lists for hysterectomy for benign conditions.
METHODS: In-depth semi-structured interviews were undertaken with 16 women awaiting hysterectomy to examine their views of prophylactic oophorectomy, menopause and HRT use. Interviews were transcribed. Nud*ist was used to organise the data. Analysis was undertaken by two researchers working independently who then met to agree themes.
RESULTS: Women held treatment preferences both about the removal or retention of their ovaries and about subsequent HRT use. Many of the women did not want oophorectomy because of a dislike of a sudden menopause. Those who were planning to have an oophorectomy tended to have more severe symptoms. Some women were fearful of ovarian cancer--one woman described it as a 'silent killer'. A further theme was apparent in the discussion of ovaries as 'redundant' with further discussion of healthy versus problematic ovaries. Many women felt inadequately informed about their treatment options and were unaware of important longer term outcomes of oophorectomy such as an increased risk of osteoporosis or of coronary heart disease.
CONCLUSION: It appears that many women emphasise the 'natural' when considering oophorectomy and the use of HRT. Women were uneasy both about a sudden menopause and about the risks of ovarian cancer. And although these women were all about to undergo surgery, they had experienced an apparent serious lack of information especially about long term risks and benefits on which they might base their decision.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12618161

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJOG        ISSN: 1470-0328            Impact factor:   6.531


  5 in total

1.  Psychosexual health 5 years after hysterectomy: population-based comparison with endometrial ablation for dysfunctional uterine bleeding.

Authors:  Klim McPherson; Aleks Herbert; Andrew Judge; Aileen Clarke; Stephen Bridgman; Michael Maresh; Chris Overton
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 3.377

2.  Readmission to hospital 5 years after hysterectomy or endometrial resection in a national cohort study.

Authors:  A Clarke; A Judge; A Herbert; K McPherson; S Bridgman; M Maresh; C Overton; D Altman
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2005-02

3.  Factors associated with undergoing bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy at the time of hysterectomy for benign conditions.

Authors:  Vanessa L Jacoby; Eric Vittinghoff; Sanae Nakagawa; Rebecca Jackson; Holly E Richter; John Chan; Miriam Kuppermann
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 7.661

4.  Hysterectomy at a Canadian tertiary care facility: results of a one year retrospective review.

Authors:  Alina Toma; Wilma M Hopman; R Hugh Gorwill
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2004-11-23       Impact factor: 2.809

5.  "It was a no-brainer": A qualitative study of factors driving previvors' decision-making when considering risk-reducing salpingectomy with delayed oophorectomy.

Authors:  Caroline Gellman; Charlotte Ezratty; Julia Schwarz; Valentin Kolev; Stephanie V Blank
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol Rep       Date:  2022-02-26
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.