Literature DB >> 12617304

The role of central parts of the brain in the control of sound production during courtship in Drosophila melanogaster.

A V Popov1, N A Sitnik, E V Savvateeva-Popova, R Wolf, M Heisenberg.   

Abstract

The question of the roles of the two main parts of the insect brain, the mushroom bodies and the central complex, in controlling motor coordination and triggering a variety of behavioral programs, including sound production, remains controversial. With the aim of improving our understanding of this question, we studied the parameters of songs used by five-day-old males during courtship for fertilized wild-type females (Canton-S, C-S) over 5-min periods at 25 degrees C; males were of two wild-type Drosophila melanogaster lines (Berlin and C-S). Berlin males lacking mushroom bodies because of treatment with hydroxyurea during development (chemical removal of the mushroom bodies) were used, along with two mutants with defects in the mushroom bodies (mbm1 and mud1), two mutants with defects in the central complex (ccbKS127 and cexKS181), and mutant cxbN71 with defects in both the mushroom bodies and the central complex. The experiments reported here showed that courtship songs in males lacking mushroom bodies were virtually identical to those of wild-type males. The main parameters of pulsatile song in mutants mbm1 and mud1 (interpulse interval and train duration) were insignificantly different from those of the songs of wild-type flies, though the stability of the pulse oscillator was the same. Flies of these lines were no different from wild-type flies in terms of courtship success (percentage of copulating pairs in 10-min tests). Conversely, the songs of mutants with defects in the central complex differed from those of wild-type males. Firstly, there was degradation of the stability of the pulse oscillator and interpulse intervals were very variable. In addition, pulses were often significantly longer and appeared multicyclic, as in the well-known cacophony mutant, while the mean train duration was significantly shorter. Males of the line cexKS181 usually courted very intensely, though abnormal sounds were generally emitted. Mutants cexKS181 and ccbKS127 were significantly less successful in courtship than wild-type flies. These data show that the central complex appears to play a very important role in controlling song, while the mushroom bodies are not related to this function.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12617304     DOI: 10.1023/a:1021179331583

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosci Behav Physiol        ISSN: 0097-0549


  12 in total

1.  Central complex substructures are required for the maintenance of locomotor activity in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  J R Martin; T Raabe; M Heisenberg
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 1.836

2.  Mapping of behaviour in Drosophila mosaics.

Authors:  Y Hotta; S Benzer
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1972-12-29       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Portions of the central nervous system controlling reproductive behavior in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  J C Hall
Journal:  Behav Genet       Date:  1977-07       Impact factor: 2.805

4.  The love song of the fruit fly.

Authors:  H C Bennet-Clark; A W Ewing
Journal:  Sci Am       Date:  1970-07       Impact factor: 2.142

5.  A higher control center of locomotor behavior in the Drosophila brain.

Authors:  R Strauss; M Heisenberg
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Mutants of brain structure and function: what is the significance of the mushroom bodies for behavior?

Authors:  M Heisenberg
Journal:  Basic Life Sci       Date:  1980

7.  Neural reorganization during metamorphosis of the corpora pedunculata in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  G Technau; M Heisenberg
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1982-02-04       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Age-dependent memory loss, synaptic pathology and altered brain plasticity in the Drosophila mutant cardinal accumulating 3-hydroxykynurenine.

Authors:  E Savvateeva; A Popov; N Kamyshev; J Bragina; M Heisenberg; D Senitz; J Kornhuber; P Riederer
Journal:  J Neural Transm (Vienna)       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 3.575

9.  Analysis of temperature-sensitive mutants reveals new genes involved in the courtship song of Drosophila.

Authors:  A A Peixoto; J C Hall
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 4.562

10.  Associative odor learning in Drosophila abolished by chemical ablation of mushroom bodies.

Authors:  J S de Belle; M Heisenberg
Journal:  Science       Date:  1994-02-04       Impact factor: 47.728

View more
  2 in total

1.  A putative vesicular transporter expressed in Drosophila mushroom bodies that mediates sexual behavior may define a neurotransmitter system.

Authors:  Elizabeth S Brooks; Christina L Greer; Rafael Romero-Calderón; Christine N Serway; Anna Grygoruk; Jasmine M Haimovitz; Bac T Nguyen; Rod Najibi; Christopher J Tabone; J Steven de Belle; David E Krantz
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2011-10-20       Impact factor: 17.173

2.  Neuroarchitecture and neuroanatomy of the Drosophila central complex: A GAL4-based dissection of protocerebral bridge neurons and circuits.

Authors:  Tanya Wolff; Nirmala A Iyer; Gerald M Rubin
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  2014-12-16       Impact factor: 3.215

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.