Literature DB >> 12616666

Clinical development of an everolimus pediatric formulation: relative bioavailability, food effect, and steady-state pharmacokinetics.

John M Kovarik1, Adele Noe, Stephane Berthier, Louis McMahon, Wayne K Langholff, Alan S Marion, Peter Friedrich Hoyer, Robert Ettenger, Christiane Rordorf.   

Abstract

The immunosuppressant everolimus used in organ transplantation is formulated as a conventional tablet for adults and a dispersible tablet that can be administered in water for pediatric use. As part of the pediatric clinical development program, the relative bioavailability and food effect for the dispersible tablet were evaluated in healthy adult subjects as a prelude to characterizing the steady-state pharmacokinetics in pediatric kidney allograft recipients. In a randomized, open-label, three-way crossover study, 24 healthy adults received single 1.5-mg oral doses of everolimus as (1) six 0.25-mg dispersible tablets in water, (2) two 0.75-mg conventional tablets, and (3) six 0.25-mg dispersible tablets in water after a high-fat breakfast. Cmax and AUC were evaluated by standard bioequivalence testing to determine relative bioavailability and to quantify the effect of food. In a multicenter open-label efficacy/safety trial, pediatric renal allograft recipients received 0.8 mg/m2 (maximum 1.5 mg) bid everolimus as dispersible tablets in water. Serial trough concentrations over the first week and a steady-state pharmacokinetic profile on day 7 posttransplant were collected in 19 patients ranging from ages 2 to 16 years old. The bioavailability of everolimus from the dispersible tablet was 10% lower relative to the conventional tablet, with a ratio (90% confidence interval) of 0.90 (0.76-1.07). After a high-fat meal, tmax was delayed by a median 2.5 hours, and Cmax was reduced by 50%. Overall absorption, however, was not affected by food inasmuch as the fed/fasting AUC ratio was 0.99 (0.83-1.17). In pediatric patients, steady state was reached between days 3 and 5. The corresponding steady-state parameters were as follows: Cmin, 4.4 +/- 1.7 ng/ml; Cmax, 13.6 +/- 4.2 ng/ml; and AUC, 87 +/- 27 ng.h/ml. Steady-state concentration-time profiles in pediatric transplant patients receiving the dispersible tablet were comparable to those of adult patients receiving the conventional tablet when both were dosed to yield similar trough concentrations. If a pediatric patient is converted from the everolimus dispersible tablet to the conventional tablet, this should be based on a 1:1 milligram switch with subsequent therapeutic drug monitoring to further individualize the dose as needed. The dispersible tablet formulation should be taken consistently either with or without food to minimize fluctuations in exposure over time.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12616666     DOI: 10.1177/0091270002239822

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Pharmacol        ISSN: 0091-2700            Impact factor:   3.126


  10 in total

Review 1.  Formulations for children: problems and solutions.

Authors:  Hannah K Batchelor; John F Marriott
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 2.  Pharmacokinetic optimization of immunosuppressive therapy in thoracic transplantation: part II.

Authors:  Caroline Monchaud; Pierre Marquet
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 3.  Pharmacokinetic optimization of immunosuppressive therapy in thoracic transplantation: part I.

Authors:  Caroline Monchaud; Pierre Marquet
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 4.  Inhibitors of mTOR.

Authors:  Heinz-Josef Klümpen; Jos H Beijnen; Howard Gurney; Jan H M Schellens
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2010-12-08

Review 5.  Everolimus and sirolimus in transplantation-related but different.

Authors:  Jost Klawitter; Björn Nashan; Uwe Christians
Journal:  Expert Opin Drug Saf       Date:  2015-04-26       Impact factor: 4.250

Review 6.  Clinical pharmacokinetics of everolimus.

Authors:  Gabriele I Kirchner; Ivo Meier-Wiedenbach; Michael P Manns
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 7.  Everolimus in heart transplantation: an update.

Authors:  Stephan W Hirt; Christoph Bara; Markus J Barten; Tobias Deuse; Andreas O Doesch; Ingo Kaczmarek; Uwe Schulz; Jörg Stypmann; Assad Haneya; Hans B Lehmkuhl
Journal:  J Transplant       Date:  2013-12-05

Review 8.  Influence of Food on Paediatric Gastrointestinal Drug Absorption Following Oral Administration: A Review.

Authors:  Hannah K Batchelor
Journal:  Children (Basel)       Date:  2015-06-09

9.  A POETIC Phase II study of continuous oral everolimus in recurrent, radiographically progressive pediatric low-grade glioma.

Authors:  Karen D Wright; Xiaopan Yao; Wendy B London; Pei-Chi Kao; Lia Gore; Stephen Hunger; Russ Geyer; Kenneth J Cohen; Jeffrey C Allen; Howard M Katzenstein; Amy Smith; Jessica Boklan; Kellie Nazemi; Tanya Trippett; Matthias Karajannis; Cynthia Herzog; Joseph Destefano; Jennifer Direnzo; Jay Pietrantonio; Lianne Greenspan; Danielle Cassidy; Debra Schissel; John Perentesis; Mitali Basu; Tomoyuki Mizuno; Alexander A Vinks; Sanjay P Prabhu; Susan N Chi; Mark W Kieran
Journal:  Pediatr Blood Cancer       Date:  2020-11-02       Impact factor: 3.838

Review 10.  The role of everolimus in liver transplantation.

Authors:  Rainer Ganschow; Jörg-Matthias Pollok; Martin Jankofsky; Guido Junge
Journal:  Clin Exp Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-09-02
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.