Literature DB >> 12614412

Ambulatory phlebectomy versus compression sclerotherapy: results of a randomized controlled trial.

Kees-Peter de Roos1, Fred H M Nieman, H A Martino Neumann.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although no randomized controlled trial has assessed the effects of either compression sclerotherapy or ambulatory phlebectomy, both techniques are used to treat varicose veins worldwide. We performed a randomized controlled trial to compare recurrence rates of varicose veins and complications after compression sclerotherapy and ambulatory phlebectomy.
METHODS: From September 1996 to October 1998, we randomly allocated 49 legs to compression sclerotherapy and 49 legs to ambulatory phlebectomy. Our primary outcome parameters were as follows: recurrence rates at 1 and 2 years and complications related to therapy. Eighty-two patients were included, of whom 16 were included with both of their legs. The number of treated legs was therefore 98, but two patients were lost to follow-up.
RESULTS: One year recurrence amounted to 1 out of 48 for phlebectomy and 12 out of 48 for compression sclerotherapy (P<0.001); at 2 years, six additional recurrences were found, but then solely for compression sclerotherapy (P<0.001). Significant differences in complications occurring more in phlebectomy than in compression sclerotherapy therapy were blisters, teleangiectatic matting, scar formation, and bruising from bandaging.
CONCLUSION: Our results show that ambulatory phlebectomy is an effective therapy for varicose veins of the leg. Recurrence rates are significantly lower than for compression sclerotherapy therapy. If varicose veins persist 4 weeks after compression sclerotherapy, it can be argued that to reduce the risk of future recurrence ambulatory phlebectomy should be considered as the better treatment option.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12614412     DOI: 10.1046/j.1524-4725.2003.29053.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dermatol Surg        ISSN: 1076-0512            Impact factor:   3.398


  5 in total

Review 1.  Varicose veins.

Authors:  Paul Tisi
Journal:  BMJ Clin Evid       Date:  2007-10-18

Review 2.  Varicose veins.

Authors:  Paul V Tisi
Journal:  BMJ Clin Evid       Date:  2011-01-05

3.  Age is not a barrier to good outcomes following ambulatory high ligation and stripping for varicose veins: A prospective cohort study.

Authors:  ChuWen Chen; YuTing Cai; XiaoQing Long; Xiang Fan; Ding Yuan; Yi Yang; Bin Huang; JiChun Zhao; YuKui Ma
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 1.889

4.  The Effect of Body Mass Index on Outcome Following Ambulatory High Ligation and Stripping for Lower Varicose Veins: A Prospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Chu Wen Chen; Yu T Cai; Jia R Wang; Zhou P Wu; Yang Liu; Bing Huang; Yi Yang; Ding Yuan; Yu K Ma; Ji C Zhao
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2022-04-04

Review 5.  Surgery versus sclerotherapy for the treatment of varicose veins.

Authors:  K A Rigby; S J Palfreyman; C Beverley; J A Michaels
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2004-10-18
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.