Literature DB >> 12614180

Enhancing the effectiveness of drug-based cancer therapy by electroporation (electropermeabilization).

Dietmar P Rabussay1, Gurvinder S Nanda, Paul M Goldfarb.   

Abstract

Many conventional chemotherapeutic drugs, as well as DNA for cancer gene therapy, require efficient access to the cell interior to be effective. The cell membrane is a formidable barrier to many of these drugs, including therapeutic DNA constructs. Electropermeabilization (EP, often used synonymously with "electroporation") has become a useful method to temporarily increase the permeability of the cell membrane, allowing a broad variety of molecules efficient access to the cell interior. EP is achieved by the application of short electrical pulses of relatively high local field strength to the target tissue of choice. In cancer therapy, EP can be applied in vivo directly to the tumor to be treated, in order to enhance intracellular uptake of drugs or DNA. Alternatively, EP can be used to deliver DNA into cells of healthy tissue to achieve longer-lasting expression of cancer-suppressing genes. In addition, EP has been used in ex vivo therapeutic approaches for the transfection of a variety of cells in suspension. In this paper, we communicate results related to the development of a treatment for squamous cell carcinomas of the head and neck, using electropermeabilization to deliver the drug bleomycin in vivo directly into the tumor cells. This drug, which is not particularly effective as a conventional therapeutic, becomes highly potent when the intracellular concentration is enhanced by EP treatment. In animal model experiments we found a drug dose of 1 U/cm(3) tumor tissue (delivered in 0.25 mL of an aqueous solution/cm3 tumor tissue) and an electrical field strength of 750 V/cm or higher to be optimal for the treatment of human squamous cell tumors grown subcutaneously in mice. Within 24-48 hours, the majority of tumor cells are rapidly destroyed by this bleomycin-electroporation therapy (B-EPT). This raises the concern that healthy tissue may be similarly affected. In studies with large animals we showed that normal muscle and skin tissue, normal tissue surrounding major blood vessels and nerves, as well as healthy blood vessels and nerves themselves, are much less affected than tumor tissue. Normal tissues did show acute, focal, and transitory effects after treatment, but these effects are relatively minor under standard treatment conditions. The severity of these effects increases with the number of electric pulse cycles and applied voltage. The observed histological changes resolved 20 to 40 days after treatment or sooner, even after excessive EP treatment. Thus, B-EPT is distinct from other ablative therapies, such as thermal, cryo, or photodynamic ablation, which equally affect healthy and tumor tissue. In comparison to surgical or radiation therapy, B-EPT also has potential as a tissue-sparing and function-preserving therapy. In clinical studies with over 50 late stage head and neck cancer patients, objective tumor response rates of 55-58%, and complete tumor response rates of 19-30% have been achieved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12614180     DOI: 10.1177/153303460200100110

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Technol Cancer Res Treat        ISSN: 1533-0338


  10 in total

1.  In vivo electroporation of minicircle DNA as a novel method of vaccine delivery to enhance HIV-1-specific immune responses.

Authors:  Qingtao Wang; Wei Jiang; Yuhai Chen; Pengyu Liu; Chunjie Sheng; Shuai Chen; Hui Zhang; Changchuan Pan; Shijuan Gao; Wenlin Huang
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2013-11-27       Impact factor: 5.103

2.  Irreversible electroporation of the liver and liver hilum in swine.

Authors:  Kevin P Charpentier; Farrah Wolf; Lelia Noble; Brody Winn; Murray Resnick; Damian E Dupuy
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2011-01-25       Impact factor: 3.647

3.  Neutron-activatable needles for radionuclide therapy of solid tumors.

Authors:  Junghyun Kim; Roger J Narayan; Xiuling Lu; Michael Jay
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res A       Date:  2017-09-15       Impact factor: 4.396

4.  Irreversible electroporation of the pancreas in swine: a pilot study.

Authors:  Kevin P Charpentier; Farrah Wolf; Lelia Noble; Brody Winn; Murray Resnick; Damian E Dupuy
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 3.647

Review 5.  Electrochemotherapy in head and neck cancer: A review of an emerging cancer treatment.

Authors:  Armando De Virgilio; Massimo Ralli; Lucia Longo; Patrizia Mancini; Giuseppe Attanasio; Francesca Atturo; Marco De Vincentiis; Antonio Greco
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2018-07-12       Impact factor: 2.967

Review 6.  The controversial role of electrochemotherapy in head and neck cancer: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Riccardo Lenzi; Luca Muscatello; Alberto Maria Saibene; Giovanni Felisati; Carlotta Pipolo
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2017-02-24       Impact factor: 2.503

7.  Tolerability of two sequential electroporation treatments using MedPulser DNA delivery system (DDS) in healthy adults.

Authors:  Mark Wallace; Barbara Evans; Sandra Woods; Robin Mogg; Lei Zhang; Adam C Finnefrock; Dietmar Rabussay; Michael Fons; John Mallee; Devan Mehrotra; Florian Schödel; Luwy Musey
Journal:  Mol Ther       Date:  2009-03-10       Impact factor: 11.454

8.  PTD-mediated loading of tumor-seeking lymphocytes with prodrug-activating enzymes.

Authors:  Qin Yang; Stine K Larsen; Zhibao Mi; Paul D Robbins; Per H Basse
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2008-12-23       Impact factor: 4.009

9.  Plasmid injection and application of electric pulses alter endogenous mRNA and protein expression in B16.F10 mouse melanomas.

Authors:  L C Heller; Y L Cruz; B Ferraro; H Yang; R Heller
Journal:  Cancer Gene Ther       Date:  2010-08-13       Impact factor: 5.987

10.  The Role of Electrochemotherapy in the Cutaneous and Subcutaneous Metastases From Breast Cancer: Analysis of Predictive Factors to Treatment From an Italian Cohort of Patients.

Authors:  Francesco Russano; Paolo Del Fiore; Claudia Di Prata; Andrea Pasqual; Roberto Marconato; Luca Giovanni Campana; Romina Spina; Carlo Maria Gianesini; Alessandra Collodetto; Saveria Tropea; Luigi Dall'Olmo; Sabrina Carraro; Alessandro Parisi; Sara Galuppo; Giovanni Scarzello; Francesca De Terlizzi; Marco Rastrelli; Simone Mocellin
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-12-21       Impact factor: 6.244

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.