Literature DB >> 12613057

Use of referral reply letters for continuing medical education: a review.

Anna Gagliardi1.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Referrals between generalists and specialists are a central component of the health care system and necessitate effective communication between the involved providers. Despite the high prevalence of patient referrals and their crucial role in continuity and quality of care, the medical literature demonstrates that generalists may receive little or no information about the care their patients received and little information about the appropriateness of the referral or recommendations for follow-up care. General practitioners (GPs) prefer teaching that is directly related to their clinical work rather than traditional continuing education such as formal lectures. The purpose of this review is to assess the role of referral reply letters in the continuing education of GPs.
METHODS: A comprehensive literature search was conducted to November 2001 using MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, and the Research and Development Resource Base developed by Continuing Education, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, to identify studies that examined the use of referral letters for the transfer of information from specialists to referring physicians. Data on methodology, unit of analysis, main outcome measures, and results were extracted.
RESULTS: Of 1,250 articles retrieved, 9 met the eligibility criteria. Three of these analyzed the content of referral reply letters and 6 described the results of surveys of general and specialty physicians. DISCUSSION: Little educational content is currently included in letters from specialists to referring GPs. GPs are receptive to the use of referral replies as sources of learning.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12613057     DOI: 10.1002/chp.1340220406

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Contin Educ Health Prof        ISSN: 0894-1912            Impact factor:   1.355


  4 in total

Review 1.  The interface of primary and oncology specialty care: from symptoms to diagnosis.

Authors:  Larissa Nekhlyudov; Steven Latosinsky
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr       Date:  2010

2.  How do general practitioners and specialists value their mutual communication? A survey.

Authors:  Annette J Berendsen; Annegriet Kuiken; Wim H G M Benneker; Betty Meyboom-de Jong; Theo B Voorn; Jan Schuling
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2009-08-08       Impact factor: 2.655

3.  Completeness of obstetric referral letters/notes from subdistrict to district level in three rural districts in Greater Accra region of Ghana: an implementation research using mixed methods.

Authors:  Mary Amoakoh-Coleman; Evelyn Ansah; Kerstin Klipstein-Grobusch; Daniel Arhinful
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-09-13       Impact factor: 2.692

4.  Challenges in multidisciplinary cancer care among general surgeons in Canada.

Authors:  Anna R Gagliardi; Frances C Wright; Dave Davis; Robin S McLeod; David R Urbach
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2008-12-22       Impact factor: 2.796

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.