Literature DB >> 12612819

The effect of screening sonography on the positive rate of enemas for intussusception.

Susan Henrikson1, Caroline E Blane, Khaldoun Koujok, Peter J Strouse, Michael A DiPietro, Mitchell M Goodsitt.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The referring physicians at our institution used the enema as a diagnostic test in children with suspected intussusception.
OBJECTIVE: To determine the change in rate of positive enema findings performed for suspected intussusception with the intervention of screening ultrasound (US).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Since October 1995, 224 children (mean age 2.2 years) with suspected intussusception were referred for enema examination. In January 2001, US was introduced as a screening test for intussusception. Enemas were performed for all children with positive US findings and were offered for those with negative US findings if clinical suspicion persisted.
RESULTS: Before 2001, 184 children underwent enema with intussusception documented in 40 (22%). Since January 2001, 40 children have been seen with suspected intussusception (12/40 positive or 30%). Two directly underwent enema (1/2 positive); 38 children underwent US. In 12 of 38 children, the US finding was positive, and an intussusception was found at enema examination in 11 of 12. In 26 cases, the US finding was negative. Seven of the 26 children with a negative sonogram finding had an enema, which was also negative. Nineteen enemas were canceled. With a screening US, the positive rate for enemas is now 58% (11/19). We know of no case of intussusception missed at US.
CONCLUSION: Screening US has decreased unnecessary enemas for clinically suspected intussusception, increasing positive findings from 22% to 58%. This has in turn reduced children's exposure to radiation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12612819     DOI: 10.1007/s00247-002-0848-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatr Radiol        ISSN: 0301-0449


  9 in total

1.  Clinical application of ultrasonography in the diagnosis of intussusception.

Authors:  D M Bhisitkul; R Listernick; A Shkolnik; J S Donaldson; B D Henricks; K A Feinstein; S K Fernbach
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 4.406

2.  Intussusception: US findings with pathologic correlation--the crescent-in-doughnut sign.

Authors:  G del-Pozo; J C Albillos; D Tejedor
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  Intussusception: indications for ultrasonography and an explanation of the doughnut and pseudokidney signs.

Authors:  L E Swischuk; C K Hayden; T Boulden
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  1985

4.  Acute intestinal intussusception in children. Contribution of ultrasonography (145 cases).

Authors:  J P Pracros; V A Tran-Minh; C H Morin de Finfe; P Deffrenne-Pracros; D Louis; T Basset
Journal:  Ann Radiol (Paris)       Date:  1987

5.  Ultrasonography is accurate enough for the diagnosis of intussusception.

Authors:  R L Shanbhogue; S M Hussain; M Meradji; S G Robben; J E Vernooij; J C Molenaar
Journal:  J Pediatr Surg       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 2.545

6.  Real-time ultrasound diagnosis of intussusception in children.

Authors:  R A Bowerman; T M Silver; M H Jaffe
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1982-05       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  Spontaneous reduction of intussusception: verification with US.

Authors:  L E Swischuk; S D John; P N Swischuk
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Ultrasonography to diagnose and exclude intussusception in Henoch-Schönlein purpura.

Authors:  S C Hu; M S Feeney; M McNicholas; D O'Halpin; R J Fitzgerald
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 3.791

9.  Intussusception in children: reliability of US in diagnosis--a prospective study.

Authors:  P Verschelden; D Filiatrault; L Garel; A Grignon; G Perreault; J Boisvert; J Dubois
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 11.105

  9 in total
  8 in total

1.  Intussusception: still work in progress.

Authors:  Gloria del Pozo
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2004-11-24

2.  Success with hydrostatic reduction of intussusception in relation to duration of symptoms.

Authors:  E D van den Ende; J H Allema; F W J Hazebroek; P J Breslau
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  2005-06-07       Impact factor: 3.791

Review 3.  Intussusception in children: evidence-based diagnosis and treatment.

Authors:  Kimberly E Applegate
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2009-04

4.  External manual reduction of paediatric idiopathic ileocolic intussusception with US assistance: a new, standardised, effective and safe manoeuvre.

Authors:  Jose L Vazquez; Manuel Ortiz; Maria C Doniz; Margarita Montero; Victor M Del Campo
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2012-08-09

5.  Intramural and subserosal echogenic foci on US in large-bowel intussusceptions: prognostic indicator for reducibility?

Authors:  Enno Stranzinger; Michael A Dipietro; Sai Yarram; Shokoufeh Khalatbari; Peter J Strouse
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2008-11-04

6.  Validation of US as a first-line diagnostic test for assessment of pediatric ileocolic intussusception.

Authors:  Anastasia L Hryhorczuk; Peter J Strouse
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2009-08-06

7.  Intussusception in children: can we rely on screening sonography performed by junior residents?

Authors:  Iris Eshed; Arkadi Gorenstein; Francis Serour; Michaela Witzling
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2003-11-20

8.  Performance of Deep Learning-Based Algorithm for Detection of Pediatric Intussusception on Abdominal Ultrasound Images.

Authors:  Zheming Li; Chunze Song; Jian Huang; Jing Li; Shoujiang Huang; Baoxin Qian; Xing Chen; Shasha Hu; Ting Shu; Gang Yu
Journal:  Gastroenterol Res Pract       Date:  2022-08-12       Impact factor: 1.919

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.