Literature DB >> 12612785

Protocol for laboratory testing of crude-oil bioremediation products in freshwater conditions.

J R Haines1, K M Koran, E L Holder, A D Venosa.   

Abstract

In 1993, the Environmental Protection Agency, National Risk Management Research Laboratory (EPA, NRMRL), with the National Environmental Technology Application Center (NETAC), developed a protocol for evaluation of bioremediation products in marine environments [18]. The marine protocol was adapted for application in freshwater environments by using a chemically defined medium and an oil-degrading consortium as a positive control. Four products were tested using the modified protocol: two with nutrients and an oleophilic component; one with nutrients, sorbent, and organisms; and one microbial stimulant. A separate experiment evaluated the use of HEPES and MOPSO buffers as replacements for phosphate buffer. The oleophilic nutrient products yielded oil degradation similar to the positive control, with an average alkane removal of 97.1+/-2.3% and an aromatic hydrocarbon removal of 64.8+/-1.2%. The positive control, which received inoculum plus nutrients, demonstrated alkane degradation of 98.9+/-0.1% and aromatic degradation of 52.9+/-0.1%. The sorbent-based product with inoculum failed to demonstrate oil degradation, while the microbial stimulant showed less oil degradation than the positive control. Replacement of phosphate buffer with other buffers had no significant effect on one product's performance. Differences in product performance were easily distinguishable using the protocol, and performance targets for alkane and aromatic hydrocarbon degradation are suggested.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12612785     DOI: 10.1007/s10295-002-0018-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol        ISSN: 1367-5435            Impact factor:   3.346


  6 in total

1.  Microbial community dynamics and evaluation of bioremediation strategies in oil-impacted salt marsh sediment microcosms.

Authors:  D S Bachoon; R Araujo; M Molina; R E Hodson
Journal:  J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 3.346

2.  Efficiency of indigenous and inoculated cold-adapted soil microorganisms for biodegradation of diesel oil in alpine soils.

Authors:  R Margesin; F Schinner
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Selective enumeration of aromatic and aliphatic hydrocarbon degrading bacteria by a most-probable-number procedure.

Authors:  B A Wrenn; A D Venosa
Journal:  Can J Microbiol       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 2.419

Review 4.  Field evaluations of marine oil spill bioremediation.

Authors:  R P Swannell; K Lee; M McDonagh
Journal:  Microbiol Rev       Date:  1996-06

5.  Microbial population changes during bioremediation of an experimental oil spill.

Authors:  S J MacNaughton; J R Stephen; A D Venosa; G A Davis; Y J Chang; D C White
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 4.792

6.  Evaluation of inoculum addition to stimulate in situ bioremediation of oily-sludge-contaminated soil.

Authors:  S Mishra; J Jyot; R C Kuhad; B Lal
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 4.792

  6 in total
  2 in total

1.  Laboratory evaluation of oil spill bioremediation products in salt and freshwater systems.

Authors:  John R Haines; Eric J Kleiner; Kim A McClellan; Karen M Koran; Edith L Holder; Dennis W King; Albert D Venosa
Journal:  J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2005-05-03       Impact factor: 3.346

Review 2.  Recent advances in petroleum microbiology.

Authors:  Jonathan D Van Hamme; Ajay Singh; Owen P Ward
Journal:  Microbiol Mol Biol Rev       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 11.056

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.